Now at that time, the Buddha, the Blessed One, was dwelling
near Kapilavatthu in the Banyan Park.
Then Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī went to the Blessed One and, on
arrival, having bowed to him, stood to one side. As she was
standing there, she said to him: “It would be good, lord, if
women might obtain the Going-forth from home into homelessness in
the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the Tathāgata.”
“Enough, Gotamī. Don’t advocate women’s Going-forth from home
into homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata.”
A second time… A third time, she said to him: “It would be
good, lord, if women might obtain the Going-forth from home into
homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata.”
“Enough, Gotamī. Don’t advocate women’s Going-forth from home
into homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata.”105
So Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī, (thinking,) “The Blessed One does not
allow women’s Going-forth from home into homelessness in the
Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the Tathāgata”—sad and unhappy,
crying, her face in tears—bowed down to the Blessed One,
circumambulated him, keeping him to her right, and then left.
The Blessed One, having stayed as long as he liked in
Kapilavatthu, set out for Vesālī. After wandering in stages, he
arrived at Vesālī. There he stayed near Vesālī at the Gabled Hall
in the Great Forest.
Then Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī, having had her hair cut off and
donning ochre robes, set out for Vesālī together with a large
number of Sakyan women. After wandering in stages, she arrived at
Vesālī and went to the Gabled Hall in the Great Forest.
Then she stood there at the outer gate: her feet swollen, her
limbs covered with dust, sad and unhappy, crying, her face in
tears. Ven. Ānanda saw her standing there… and so asked her,
“Why, Gotamī, why are you standing here… your face in tears?”
“Because, venerable sir, the Blessed One doesn’t allow women’s
Going-forth from home into homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya
made known by the Tathāgata.”
“In that case, Gotamī, stay right here for a moment while I
ask the Blessed One to allow women’s Going-forth from home into
homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata.”
Then Ven. Ānanda went to the Blessed One and, on arrival,
having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As he was sitting
there, he said to the Blessed One: “Lord, Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī is
standing outside the porch… her face in tears, because the
Blessed One does not allow women’s Going-forth from home into
homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the Tathāgata.
It would be good if women might obtain the Going-forth from home
into homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata.”
“Enough, Ānanda. Don’t advocate women’s Going-forth from home
into homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata.”
A second time… A third time, Ven. Ānanda said, “It would be
good, lord, if women might obtain the Going-forth from home into
homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata.”
“Enough, Ānanda. Don’t advocate women’s Going-forth from home
into homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata.”
Then the thought occurred to Ven. Ānanda, “The Blessed One
does not allow women’s Going-forth from home into homelessness in
the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the Tathāgata. What if I were
to find some other way to ask the Blessed One to allow women’s
Going-forth from home into homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya
made known by the Tathāgata?”
So he said to the Blessed One, “Lord, would a woman—having
gone forth from home into homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya
made known by the Tathāgata—be able to realize the fruit of
stream-entry, once-returning, non-returning, or arahantship?”
“Yes, Ānanda.…”
“Lord, if a woman, having gone forth from home into
homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the Tathāgata
would be able to realize the fruit of stream-entry,
once-returning, non-returning, or arahantship: Mahāpajāpatī
Gotamī has been of great service to the Blessed One. She was the
Blessed One’s aunt, foster mother, nurse, giver of milk. When the
Blessed One’s mother passed away, she gave him milk. So it would
be good if women might obtain the Going-forth from home into
homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata.”
The Eight Vows of Respect
“Ānanda, if Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī accepts eight vows of respect
[garu-dhamma], that will be her full Acceptance:
[1] “A nun who has been fully accepted even for a century must
bow down, rise up from her seat, salute with hands palm-to-palm
over her heart, and perform forms of respect due to superiors to
a monk even if he has been fully accepted on that very day. This
vow is to be honored, respected, revered, venerated, never to be
transgressed as long as she lives.
[2] “A nun must not spend the Rains in a residence where there
is no monk (nearby). This vow, too, is to be honored, respected,
revered, venerated, never to be transgressed as long as she
lives.
[3] “Every half-month a nun should expect two things from the
Bhikkhu Saṅgha: (permission to) ask for the date of the Uposatha
and (permission to) approach for an exhortation. This vow, too,
is to be honored, respected, revered, venerated, never to be
transgressed as long as she lives.
[4] “At the end of the Rains residence, a nun should invite
(accusations from) both Saṅghas [the Bhikkhu and Bhikkhunī
Saṅghas] on any of three grounds: what they have seen, what they
have heard, what they have suspected. This vow, too, is to be
honored, respected, revered, venerated, never to be transgressed
as long as she lives.
[5] “A nun who has broken any of the vows of respect must
undergo penance for half a month under both Saṅghas. This vow,
too, is to be honored, respected, revered, venerated, never to be
transgressed as long as she lives.
[6] “Only after a female trainee has trained in the six
precepts for two years can she request Acceptance from both
Saṅghas.… This vow, too, is to be honored, respected, revered,
venerated, never to be transgressed as long as she lives.
[7] “A monk must not in any way be insulted or reviled by a
nun. This vow is to be honored, respected, revered, venerated,
never to be transgressed as long as she lives.
[8] “From this day forward, the admonition of a monk by a nun
is forbidden, but the admonition of a nun by a monk is not
forbidden. This vow, too, is to be honored, respected, revered,
venerated, never to be transgressed as long as she lives.
“If Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī accepts these eight vows of respect,
that will be her full Acceptance.”
Then Ven. Ānanda, having learned the eight vows of respect in
the Blessed One’s presence, went to Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī and, on
arrival, said to her, “Gotamī, if you accept these eight vows of
respect, that will be your full Acceptance.… [Ven. Ānanda then
listed the vows.]
[Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī:] “Ven. Ānanda, just as if a young
woman—or man—fond of ornamentation, having bathed his or her
head, having been given a garland of lotuses or jasmine or
scented creepers, having accepted it in both hands, were to place
it on her head, in the same way, I accept the eight vows of
respect, never to transgress them as long as I live.”
Then Ven. Ānanda returned to the Blessed One and, having bowed
down, sat to one side. As he was sitting there he said, “Lord,
Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī has accepted the eight vows of respect. The
Blessed One’s maternal aunt is fully accepted.”
“But, Ānanda, if women had not obtained the Going-forth from
home into homelessness in the Dhamma & Vinaya made known by the
Tathāgata, the holy life would have lasted long. The True Dhamma
would have lasted one thousand years. But now that they have
obtained the Going-forth, this holy life will not last long. The
True Dhamma will last only five hundred years.106
“Just as a clan in which there are many women and few men is
easily plundered by robbers & thieves, in the same way, in
whatever Dhamma & Vinaya women get to go forth from home into
homelessness, the holy life does not last long.
“Just as, when the white blight107 falls on a field of ripening
wheat, that field of wheat does not last long, in the same way,
in whatever Dhamma & Vinaya women obtain the Going-forth, the
holy life does not last long.
“Just as, when the red rust disease falls on a field of sugar
cane, that field of sugar cane does not last long, in the same
way, in whatever Dhamma & Vinaya women obtain the Going-forth,
the holy life does not last long.
“Just as a man might make an embankment in advance around a
great reservoir to keep the waters from overflowing, in the same
way, I have set forth in advance the eight vows of respect for
nuns that they are not to transgress as long as they live.”
Then Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī went to the Blessed One and, on
arrival, having bowed down to him, stood to one side. As she was
standing there, she said to him, “How should I proceed with
regard to these Sakyan women?”
Then the Blessed One instructed, urged, roused, & encouraged
her with a Dhamma talk. Then, having been instructed, urged,
roused, & encouraged by the Blessed One with a Dhamma talk,
Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī, bowing down to the Blessed One,
circumambulated him, keeping him to her right, and left.
Then the Blessed One, having given a Dhamma talk for that
reason, on that occasion, addressed the monks: “I allow that nuns
be given the Acceptance by monks.”
Then the nuns said to Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī, “The venerable lady
is not accepted, whereas we are accepted, because it was
legislated by the Blessed One: ‘Nuns should be given the
Acceptance by monks.’”108
Then Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī went to Ven. Ānanda and, on arrival,
having bowed down to him, stood to one side. As she was standing
there, she said to him, “Ven. Ānanda, these nuns said to me: ‘The
venerable lady is not accepted, whereas we are accepted, because
it was legislated by the Blessed One that: “Nuns should be given
the Acceptance by monks.”’”
Then Ven. Ānanda went to the Blessed One and, on arrival,
having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As he was sitting
there, he said to the Blessed One, “Lord, Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī
said that, ‘Ven. Ānanda, these nuns said to me: “The venerable
lady is not accepted, whereas we are accepted, because it was
legislated by the Blessed One: ‘Nuns should be given the
Acceptance by monks.’”’”
“Ānanda, from the very moment that Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī
accepted the eight vows of respect, she was accepted.”
Just as was the case with the Saṅgha of monks, the nuns did
not all accept the Buddha’s ordinances docilely. For instance,
Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī soon tried to have the first vow of respect
rescinded.
Then Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī went to Ven. Ānanda and, on arrival,
having bowed down to him, stood to one side. As she was standing
there, she said to him, “Ven. Ānanda, I ask one favor of the
Blessed One. It would be good if the Blessed One would allow the
monks and nuns (to do these) according to seniority: bowing down,
rising up to greet, greeting with hands raised palm-to-palm over
the heart, and performing forms of respect due to superiors.”
Then Ven. Ānanda went to the Blessed One and, on arrival,
having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As he was sitting
there, Ven. Ānanda said to the Blessed One, “Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī
has said, ‘Ven. Ānanda, I ask one favor of the Blessed One. It
would be good if the Blessed One would allow for the monks and
nuns (to do these) according to seniority: bowing down, rising up
to greet, greeting with hands raised palm-to-palm over the heart,
and performing forms of respect due to superiors.’”
“That is impossible, Ānanda. It cannot happen that the
Tathāgata would allow bowing down, rising up to greet, greeting
with hands raised palm-to-palm over the heart, and performing
forms of respect due to superiors to a woman. Ānanda, even these
wanderers of other sects with poorly expounded Dhammas don’t bow
down to a woman, stand up to greet, salute with hands placed
palm-to-palm over the heart, or perform forms of respect due to
superiors to a woman. So for what reason would the Tathāgata
allow bowing down to a woman, standing up to greet, saluting with
hands placed palm-to-palm over the heart, or performing forms of
respect due to superiors to a woman?”
Then the Blessed One, having given a Dhamma talk with regard
to this cause, to this incident, addressed the monks: “Bowing
down, rising up to greet, greeting with hands raised palm-to-palm
over the heart, or performing other forms of respect due to
superiors are not to be done to a woman. Whoever should do so: an
offense of wrongdoing.”
Then Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī went to the
Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed to him, stood to one
side. As she was standing there, she said to the Blessed One,
“Lord, with regard to those of the nuns’ training rules that are
in common with those of the monks: How should we proceed with
regard to them?”
“With regard to those of the nuns’ training rules that are in
common with those of the monks: However the monks train in line
with them, that’s how you should train in line with them.”
“But lord, with regard to those of the nuns’ training rules
that are not in common with those of the monks: How should we
proceed with regard to them?”
“With regard to those of the nuns’ training rules that are not
in common with those of the monks: You should train in line with
them as they have been legislated.”
Then Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī went to the
Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed to him, stood to one
side. As she was standing there, she said to the Blessed One, “It
would be good, lord, if the Blessed One would teach me the Dhamma
in brief such that, having heard the Dhamma from the Blessed One,
I might dwell alone, secluded, heedful, ardent, & resolute.”
“Gotamī, the qualities of which you may know, ‘These qualities
lead to passion, not to dispassion; to being fettered, not to
being unfettered; to accumulating, not to shedding; to
self-aggrandizement, not to modesty; to discontent, not to
contentment; to entanglement, not to seclusion; to laziness, not
to aroused persistence; to being burdensome, not to being
unburdensome’: You may categorically hold, ‘This is not the
Dhamma, this is not the Vinaya, this is not the Teacher’s
instruction.’
“As for the qualities of which you may know, ‘These qualities
lead to dispassion, not to passion; to being unfettered, not to
being fettered; to shedding, not to accumulating; to modesty, not
to self-aggrandizement; to contentment, not to discontent; to
seclusion, not to entanglement; to aroused persistence, not to
laziness; to being unburdensome, not to being burdensome’: You
may categorically hold, ‘This is the Dhamma, this is the Vinaya,
this is the Teacher’s instruction.’”
Now at that time, the monks were not
reciting the Pāṭimokkha to the nuns. The monks reported the
matter to the Blessed One.…
“Monks, I allow the Pāṭimokkha to be recited to the nuns.”
Then the thought occurred to the monks, “By whom should the
Pāṭimokkha be recited to the nuns?” They reported the matter to
the Blessed One.…
“Monks, I allow the Pāṭimokkha to be recited to the nuns by
the monks.”
Now at that time the monks, having gone to the nuns’ quarters,
recited the Pāṭimokkha to the nuns. People were offended &
annoyed & spread it about: “Those are the mistresses of these;
these are the lovers of those. Now they’re going to enjoy
themselves with them!” …
The monks reported the matter to the Blessed One.…
“The Pāṭimokkha is not to be recited to nuns by monks. Whoever
should recite it: an offense of wrongdoing. I allow that the
Pāṭimokkha be recited to nuns by nuns”
The nuns didn’t know how to recite the Pāṭimokkha. The monks
reported the matter to the Blessed One.…
“I allow monks to tell nuns how to recite the Pāṭimokkha.”
Now at that time, the nuns were not confessing their offenses.
The monks reported the matter to the Blessed One.…
“Monks, an offence should not not be confessed by a nun.
Whoever should not confess it: an offense of wrongdoing.”
The nuns didn’t know how to confess an offense. The monks
reported the matter to the Blessed One.…
“I allow monks to tell nuns how an offense is to be
confessed.”
Then the thought occurred to the monks: “By whom should the
nuns’ confessions be acknowledged?” They reported the matter to
the Blessed One.…
“Monks, I allow the nuns’ confessions to be acknowledged by
the monks.”
Now at that time nuns, on seeing a monk along a main road, on
a side road, or at a crossroads, having placed their bowls on the
ground, having arranged their upper robes over one shoulder,
kneeling down with hands raised palm-to-palm over the heart,
confessed their offenses.
People were offended & annoyed & spread it about, “Those are
the mistresses of these; these are the lovers of those. Having
scorned them last night, they are now asking their
forgiveness.”…
The monks reported the matter to the Blessed One.…
“Nuns’ offenses are not to be acknowledged by monks. Whoever
should acknowledge it: an offense of wrongdoing. Monks, I allow
that nuns’ offenses be acknowledged by nuns.”
The nuns didn’t know how to acknowledge an offense. The monks
reported the matter to the Blessed One.…
“I allow monks to tell nuns how an offense is to be
acknowledged.”
There were both monks and nuns who were unhappy with the
third vow of respect, requiring the nuns to listen to an
exhortation from a monk every fortnight. The long-term benefits
of this vow are obvious: It would help to ensure that the
Dhamma taught and practiced by the nuns wouldn’t, over time,
deviate from that taught and practiced by the monks. However,
the exhortation instituted by the vow yielded immediate
benefits as well.
Then Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī, together with about five hundred
other nuns, went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed
down to him, stood to one side. As she was standing there she
said to him, “Lord, may the Blessed One exhort the nuns. Lord,
may the Blessed One instruct the nuns. Lord, may the Blessed One
give the nuns a talk on Dhamma.”
Now at that time the elder monks were taking turns in
exhorting the nuns, but Ven. Nandaka didn’t want to exhort the
nuns when his turn came. So the Blessed One addressed Ven.
Ānanda: “Ānanda, whose turn is it to exhort the nuns today?”
“Lord, everyone has taken his turn in exhorting the nuns
except for Ven. Nandaka, here, who doesn’t want to exhort the
nuns when his turn comes.”
Then the Blessed One addressed Ven. Nandaka: “Exhort the nuns,
Nandaka! Instruct the nuns, Nandaka! Give the nuns a talk on
Dhamma, you brahman!”
“As you say, lord,” Ven. Nandaka responded to the Blessed One.
Then, early in the morning—having adjusted his under robe and
carrying his bowl & outer robe—he went into Sāvatthī for alms.
After his meal, on returning from his almsround, he went with a
companion to Rājaka Park. The nuns saw him coming from afar and,
on seeing him, arranged a seat and set out water for his feet.
Ven. Nandaka sat down on the arranged seat and washed his feet.
The nuns, having bowed down to him, sat to one side.
As they were sitting there, Ven. Nandaka said to them: “This
will be a question-response talk, sisters. Where you understand,
you should say, ‘We understand.’ Where you don’t, you should say,
‘We don’t understand.’ Where you are doubtful or perplexed, you
should question me in response: ‘How is this, venerable sir? What
is the meaning of this?’”
“Venerable sir, we are gratified & delighted that you invite
us in this way.”
“So then, sisters, what do you think? Is the eye constant or
inconstant?” “Inconstant, venerable sir.” “And is that which is
inconstant easeful or stressful?” “Stressful, venerable sir.”
“And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful,
subject to change as: ‘This is mine. This is my self. This is
what I am’?”
“No, venerable sir.”
[Similarly with the ear, nose, tongue, & body.]
“What do you think, sisters? Is the intellect constant or
inconstant?” “Inconstant, venerable sir.” “And is that which is
inconstant easeful or stressful?” “Stressful, venerable sir.”
“And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful,
subject to change as: ‘This is mine. This is my self. This is
what I am’?”
“No, venerable sir. Why is that? Because we have already seen
it well as it has come to be, with right discernment, that these
six internal media are inconstant.”
“Good, good, sisters. That’s how it is for a disciple of the
noble ones who has seen it as it has come to be with right
discernment.
“Now what do you think, sisters? Are forms constant or
inconstant?” “Inconstant, venerable sir.” “And is that which is
inconstant easeful or stressful?” “Stressful, venerable sir.”
“And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful,
subject to change as: ‘This is mine. This is my self. This is
what I am’?”
“No, venerable sir.”
[Similarly with sounds, aromas, flavors, & tactile
sensations.]
“What do you think, sisters? Are ideas constant or
inconstant?” “Inconstant, venerable sir.” “And is that which is
inconstant easeful or stressful?” “Stressful, venerable sir.”
“And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful,
subject to change as: ‘This is mine. This is my self. This is
what I am’?”
“No, venerable sir. Why is that? Because we have already seen
it well as it has come to be, with right discernment, that these
six external media are also inconstant.”
“Good, good, sisters. That’s how it is for a disciple of the
noble ones who has seen it as it has come to be with right
discernment.
“Now what do you think, sisters? Is eye-consciousness constant
or inconstant?” “Inconstant, venerable sir.” “And is that which
is inconstant easeful or stressful?” “Stressful, venerable sir.”
“And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant, stressful,
subject to change as: ‘This is mine. This is my self. This is
what I am’?”
“No, venerable sir.”
[Similarly with ear-consciousness, nose-consciousness,
tongue-consciousness, & body-consciousness.]
“What do you think, sisters? Is intellect-consciousness
constant or inconstant?” “Inconstant, venerable sir.” “And is
that which is inconstant easeful or stressful?” “Stressful,
venerable sir.” “And is it fitting to regard what is inconstant,
stressful, subject to change as: ‘This is mine. This is my self.
This is what I am’?”
“No, venerable sir. Why is that? Because we have already seen
it well as it has come to be, with right discernment, that these
six consciousness-groups, too, are inconstant.”
“Good, good, sisters. That’s how it is for a disciple of the
noble ones who has seen it as it has come to be with right
discernment.
“Just as when the oil in a burning oil lamp is inconstant &
subject to change, its wick is inconstant & subject to change,
its flame is inconstant & subject to change, its light is
inconstant & subject to change. If someone were to say, ‘The oil
in that burning oil lamp is inconstant & subject to change, its
wick is inconstant & subject to change, its flame is inconstant &
subject to change, but as for its light, that is constant,
everlasting, eternal, & not subject to change’: Would he be
speaking rightly?”
“No, venerable sir. Why is that? Because the oil in that
burning oil lamp is inconstant & subject to change, its wick is
inconstant & subject to change, its flame is inconstant & subject
to change, so how much more should its light be inconstant &
subject to change.”
“In the same way, sisters, if someone were to say, ‘My six
internal media are inconstant, but what I experience based on the
six internal media—pleasure, pain, or neither pleasure nor
pain—that is constant, everlasting, eternal, & not subject to
change’: Would he be speaking rightly?”
“No, venerable sir. Why is that? Because each feeling arises
dependent on its corresponding condition. With the cessation of
its corresponding condition, it ceases.”
“Good, good, sisters. That’s how it is for a disciple of the
noble ones who has seen it as it has come to be with right
discernment.
“Just as when the root of a great, standing tree—possessed of
heartwood—is inconstant & subject to change, its trunk is
inconstant & subject to change, its branches & foliage are
inconstant & subject to change, its shadow is inconstant &
subject to change. If someone were to say, ‘The root of that
great, standing tree—possessed of heartwood—is inconstant &
subject to change, its trunk is inconstant & subject to change,
its branches & foliage are inconstant & subject to change, but as
for its shadow, that is constant, everlasting, eternal, & not
subject to change’: Would he be speaking rightly?”
“No, venerable sir. Why is that? Because the root of that
great, standing tree—possessed of heartwood—is inconstant &
subject to change, its trunk is inconstant & subject to change,
its branches & foliage are inconstant & subject to change, so how
much more should its shadow be inconstant & subject to
change.”
“In the same way, sisters, if someone were to say, ‘My six
external media are inconstant, but what I experience based on the
six external media—pleasure, pain, or neither pleasure nor
pain—that is constant, everlasting, eternal, & not subject to
change’: Would he be speaking rightly?”
“No, venerable sir. Why is that? Because each feeling arises
dependent on its corresponding condition. With the cessation of
its corresponding condition, it ceases.”
“Good, good, sisters. That’s how it is for a disciple of the
noble ones who has seen it as it has come to be with right
discernment.
“Just as if a dexterous butcher or butcher’s apprentice,
having killed a cow, were to carve it up with a sharp carving
knife so that—without damaging the substance of the inner flesh,
without damaging the substance of the outer hide—he would cut,
sever, & detach only the skin muscles, connective tissues, &
attachments in between. Having cut, severed, & detached the outer
skin, and then covering the cow again with that very skin, if he
were to say that the cow was joined to the skin just as it had
been: Would he be speaking rightly?”
“No, venerable sir. Why is that? Because if the dexterous
butcher or butcher’s apprentice, having killed a cow, were to…
cut, sever, & detach only the skin muscles, connective tissues, &
attachments in between; and… having covered the cow again with
that very skin, then no matter how much he might say that the cow
was joined to the skin just as it had been, the cow would still
be disjoined from the skin.“
“This simile, sisters, I have given to convey a message. The
message is this: The substance of the inner flesh stands for the
six internal media; the substance of the outer hide, for the six
external media. The skin muscles, connective tissues, &
attachments in between stand for passion & delight. And the sharp
knife stands for noble discernment—the noble discernment that
cuts, severs, & detaches the defilements, fetters, & bonds in
between.
“Sisters, there are these seven factors for awakening through
whose development & pursuit a monk enters and remains in the
effluent-free awareness-release & discernment-release, having
directly known & realized them for himself right in the
here-&-now. Which seven? There is the case where a monk
develops mindfulness as a factor for awakening dependent
on seclusion, dependent on dispassion, dependent on cessation,
resulting in relinquishment. He develops analysis of
qualities… persistence… rapture…
calm… concentration… equanimity as a
factor for awakening dependent on seclusion, dependent on
dispassion, dependent on cessation, resulting in relinquishment.
These are the seven factors for awakening through whose
development & pursuit a monk enters and remains in the
effluent-free awareness-release & discernment-release, having
directly known & realized them for himself right in the
here-&-now.”
Then, having exhorted the nuns with this exhortation, Ven.
Nandaka dismissed them, saying, “Go, sisters. The time has come.”
The nuns, delighting in and approving of Ven. Nandaka’s
exhortation, got up from their seats, bowed down to him,
circumambulated him—keeping him to the right—and went to the
Blessed One. On arrival, having bowed down to the Blessed One,
they stood to one side. As they were standing there, the Blessed
One said to them, “Go, nuns. The time has come.” So the nuns,
having bowed down to the Blessed One, circumambulated him—keeping
him to the right—and left.
Then, not long after the nuns had left, the Blessed One
addressed the monks: “Monks, just as on the Uposatha day of the
fourteenth, people at large are not doubtful or perplexed as to
whether the moon is lacking or full, for it is clearly lacking;
in the same way, even though the nuns are gratified with
Nandaka’s Dhamma-teaching, their resolves have not yet been
fulfilled.” So he addressed Ven. Nandaka: “In that case, Nandaka,
exhort the nuns again tomorrow with the exact same
exhortation.”
“As you say, lord,” Ven. Nandaka replied. Then, after the
night had passed, early in the morning—having adjusted his under
robe and carrying his bowl & outer robe—he went into Rājagaha for
alms… [as before, up to:]
Then, not long after the nuns had left, the Blessed One
addressed the monks: “Monks, just as on the Uposatha day of the
fifteenth, people at large are not doubtful or perplexed as to
whether the moon is lacking or full, for it is clearly full; in
the same way, the nuns are gratified with Nandaka’s
Dhamma-teaching, and their resolves have been fulfilled. Of these
five hundred nuns, the most backward is a stream-winner, not
destined for the planes of deprivation, headed to self-awakening
for sure.”
That is what the Blessed One said. Gratified, the monks
delighted in the Blessed One’s words.
Chapter Eight
Establishing the Nuns’ Order
Just as was the case with the Saṅgha of monks, the nuns did not all accept the Buddha’s ordinances docilely. For instance, Mahāpajāpatī Gotamī soon tried to have the first vow of respect rescinded.
There were both monks and nuns who were unhappy with the third vow of respect, requiring the nuns to listen to an exhortation from a monk every fortnight. The long-term benefits of this vow are obvious: It would help to ensure that the Dhamma taught and practiced by the nuns wouldn’t, over time, deviate from that taught and practiced by the monks. However, the exhortation instituted by the vow yielded immediate benefits as well.