As we have seen, the Buddha began legislating rules for the
Saṅgha early in his teaching career, beginning with his
allowances for Acceptance and for monasteries. However, it
wasn’t until later that he began legislating a Pāṭimokkha, a
code of rules, that eventually became the backbone of the
Vinaya. The events leading up to the legislation of the first
rule in the Pāṭimokkha are these:
At that time, the Awakened One, the Blessed One, was dwelling
in Verañjā at the foot of Naḷeru’s nimba tree with a
large Saṅgha of monks, approximately five hundred monks. A
Verañjā brahman heard, “Master Gotama the contemplative—a son of
the Sakyans, having gone forth from the Sakyan clan—is dwelling
in Verañjā at the foot of Naḷeru’s nimba tree with a large Saṅgha
of monks, approximately five hundred monks. And of that Master
Gotama this fine reputation has spread: ‘He is indeed a Blessed
One, worthy & rightly self-awakened, consummate in clear-knowing
& conduct, well-gone, an expert with regard to the cosmos,
unexcelled trainer of people fit to be tamed, teacher of devas &
human beings, awakened, blessed. He makes known—having realized
it through direct knowledge—this cosmos with its devas, Māras, &
Brahmās; this generation with its contemplatives & brahmans, its
royalty & common people. He explains the Dhamma admirable in the
beginning, admirable in the middle, admirable in the end; he
proclaims the holy life both in its particulars & in its essence,
entirely complete & pure.’ It is good to see such a worthy
one.”
So the Verañjā brahman went to the Blessed One and, on
arrival, exchanged courteous greetings with him. After an
exchange of friendly greetings & courtesies, he sat to one side.
As he was sitting there he said to the Blessed One, “I have heard
it said, Master Gotama, that ‘Gotama the contemplative does not
raise his hands in respect to aged, venerable brahmans—advanced
in years, come to the last stage of life—nor does he rise up to
greet them, nor does he offer them a seat.’ Insofar as Master
Gotama doesn’t raise his hands in respect to aged, venerable
brahmans—advanced in years, come to the last stage of life—nor
rise up to greet them, nor offer them a seat, that is simply not
right, Master Gotama.”
“That’s because, brahman, I do not see in this world with its
devas, Māras, & Brahmās, in this generation with its
contemplatives & brahmans, its royalty & common people, anyone
for whom I should raise my hands in respect, rise up to greet, or
offer a seat. Anyone to whom the Tathāgata would raise his hands
in respect, rise up to greet, or offer a seat, that person’s head
would split into pieces.”
“Master Gotama seems to have no taste.”
“There is, brahman, a manner of speaking, rightly speaking in
line with which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative
seems to have no taste.’ Any taste for sights, taste for sounds,
taste for aromas, taste for flavors, or taste for tactile
sensations: That the Tathāgata has abandoned, destroyed at the
root, made like a palmyra stump—deprived of the conditions of
development, not destined for future arising. That, brahman, is
the manner of speaking, rightly speaking in line with which, one
could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative seems to have no
taste.’ But surely you weren’t speaking in reference to
that.”
“Master Gotama is anti-social.”
“There is, brahman, a manner of speaking, rightly speaking in
line with which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative
is anti-social.’ Any sociability with sights, sociability with
sounds, sociability with aromas, sociability with flavors, or
sociability with tactile sensations: That the Tathāgata has
abandoned, destroyed at the root, made like a palmyra
stump—deprived of the conditions of development, not destined for
future arising. That, brahman, is the manner of speaking, rightly
speaking in line with which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the
contemplative is anti-social.’ But surely you weren’t speaking in
reference to that.”
“Master Gotama is a teacher of inaction.”
“There is, brahman, a manner of speaking, rightly speaking in
line with which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative
is a teacher of inaction.’ For I do teach non-doing: I teach the
non-doing of bodily misconduct, verbal misconduct, mental
misconduct, and of many types of evil, unskillful actions. That,
brahman, is the manner of speaking, rightly speaking in line with
which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative is a
teacher of inaction.’ But surely you weren’t speaking in
reference to that.”
“Master Gotama is a teacher of annihilation.”
“There is, brahman, a manner of speaking, rightly speaking in
line with which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative
is a teacher of annihilation.’ For I do teach annihilation: I
teach the annihilation of passion, aversion, delusion, and of
many types of evil, unskillful actions. That, brahman, is the
manner of speaking, rightly speaking in line with which, one
could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative is a teacher of
annihilation.’ But surely you weren’t speaking in reference to
that.”
“Master Gotama is standoffish.”
“There is, brahman, a manner of speaking, rightly speaking in
line with which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative
is standoffish.’ For I do stand off: I stand off, away from
bodily misconduct, verbal misconduct, mental misconduct, and from
the attainment of many types of evil, unskillful actions. That,
brahman, is the manner of speaking, rightly speaking in line with
which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative is
standoffish.’ But surely you weren’t speaking in reference to
that.”
“Master Gotama is a subversive.”
“There is, brahman, a manner of speaking, rightly speaking in
line with which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative
is a subversive.’ For I do teach the Dhamma for the sake of
subverting: I teach the Dhamma for the sake of subverting bodily
misconduct, verbal misconduct, mental misconduct, and many types
of evil, unskillful actions. That, brahman, is the manner of
speaking, rightly speaking in line with which, one could say of
me, ‘Gotama the contemplative is a subversive.’ But surely you
weren’t speaking in reference to that.”
“Master Gotama is an incendiary.”
“There is, brahman, a manner of speaking, rightly speaking in
line with which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative
is an incendiary.’ For I do say that evil, unskillful
actions—bodily misconduct, verbal misconduct, & mental
misconduct—should be incinerated. Anyone in whom evil, unskillful
actions that should be incinerated have been abandoned, destroyed
at the root, made like a palmyra stump—deprived of the conditions
of development, not destined for future arising: That person I
call an incendiary. And in the Tathāgata, evil, unskillful
actions that should be incinerated have been abandoned, destroyed
their root, made like a palmyra stump—deprived of the conditions
of development, not destined for future arising. That, brahman,
is the manner of speaking, rightly speaking in line with which,
one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative is an incendiary.’
But surely you weren’t speaking in reference to that.”
“Master Gotama will never find a womb to be reborn in.”
“There is, brahman, a manner of speaking, rightly speaking in
line with which, one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative
will never find a womb to be reborn in.’ Anyone for whom the
entry into the womb, the production of future becoming, has been
abandoned, destroyed at the root, made like a palmyra
stump—deprived of the conditions of development, not destined for
future arising: That person I call one who will never find a womb
to be reborn in. And for the Tathāgata the entry into the womb,
the production of future becoming has been abandoned, destroyed
at the root, made like a palmyra stump—deprived of the conditions
of development, not destined for future arising. That, brahman,
is the manner of speaking, rightly speaking in line with which,
one could say of me, ‘Gotama the contemplative will never find a
womb to be reborn in.’ But surely you weren’t speaking in
reference to that.
“Suppose, brahman, that there was a hen with eight, ten, or
twelve eggs that she had rightly covered, rightly incubated, and
rightly warmed. The first among those baby chicks to pierce its
shell with the point of its claw or its beak and break through to
safety: What should it be called? The eldest or the
youngest?”
“It should be called the eldest, Master Gotama, because it is
the eldest among them.”
“In the same way, brahman, in this generation immersed in
ignorance, become like an egg, covered over, I—having pierced the
shell of ignorance—am the only one in the world to have awakened
to the unexcelled right self-awakening. I am the eldest, the best
of the world.
“Unflagging persistence was aroused in me, brahman, and
unmuddled mindfulness established. My body was calm & unaroused,
my mind concentrated & single. Quite secluded from sensuality,
secluded from unskillful qualities, I entered and remained in the
first jhāna… the second jhāna… the third jhāna… the fourth jhāna:
purity of equanimity & mindfulness, neither pleasure nor
pain.
“When the mind was thus concentrated, purified, bright,
unblemished, rid of defilement, pliant, malleable, steady, &
attained to imperturbability, I directed it to the knowledge of
recollecting my past lives.… This, brahman, was my first
breakthrough, like the baby chick from the eggshell.… I directed
the mind to the knowledge of the passing away & reappearance of
beings.… This, brahman, was my second breakthrough, like the baby
chick from the eggshell.… I directed the mind to the knowledge of
the ending of effluents. I directly knew, as it had come to be, that
‘This is stress’ … ‘This is the origination of stress’ …
‘This is the cessation of stress’ … ‘This is the way leading to
the cessation of stress’ … ‘These are effluents’ … ‘This is the
origination of effluents’ … ‘This is the cessation of effluents’
… ‘This is the way leading to the cessation of effluents.’
My heart, thus knowing, thus seeing, was released from the
effluent of sensuality, released from the effluent of becoming,
released from the effluent of ignorance. With release, there was
the knowledge, ‘Released.’ I directly knew that ‘Birth is ended, the
holy life fulfilled, the task done. There is nothing further for
this world.’
“This was the third knowledge I attained in the third watch of
the night. Ignorance was destroyed; knowledge arose; darkness was
destroyed; light arose—as happens in one who is heedful, ardent,
& resolute. This, brahman, was my third breakthrough, like the
baby chick from the eggshell.”
When this was said, the Verañjā brahman said, “Master Gotama
is the eldest. Master Gotama is the best. Magnificent, Master
Gotama! Magnificent! Just as if he were to place upright what was
overturned, to reveal what was hidden, to show the way to one who
was lost, or to carry a lamp into the dark so that those with
eyes could see forms, in the same way, has Master Gotama—through
many lines of reasoning—made the Dhamma clear. I go to Master
Gotama for refuge, to the Dhamma, & to the Saṅgha of monks. May
Master Gotama remember me as a lay follower who has gone to him
for refuge from this day forward, for life. And may Master
Gotama, together with the Saṅgha of monks, acquiesce to my [offer
of a] Rains residence in Verañjā.”
The Blessed One acquiesced through silence.
Then the Verañjā brahman, understanding the Blessed One’s
acquiescence, rose from his seat, bowed down to the Blessed One,
circumambulated him—keeping him to his right—and left.
Now at that time Verañjā was in the midst of a famine, a time
of scarcity, the crops white with blight and turned to straw. It
wasn’t easy to maintain oneself by gleanings & patronage. And at
that time some horse dealers from the Northern Route, together
with five hundred horses, had entered into the Rains residence in
Verañjā. In the horse corrals, they prepared measure after
measure of bran for the monks. Early in the morning, the
monks—having adjusted their under robes and carrying their bowls
& outer robes—went into Verañjā for alms. Not receiving any alms,
they went to the horse corrals for alms and, taking measure after
measure of bran back to the monastery, ate it, after pounding it
again & again in a mortar. Ven. Ānanda, having crushed a measure
of bran on a stone, took it to the Blessed One, and the Blessed
One ate it.
The Blessed One heard the sound of the mortars. Now sometimes,
when knowing, Tathāgatas ask. Sometimes, when knowing, they don’t
ask. Knowing the right time they ask. Knowing the right time they
don’t ask. They ask what is connected with benefit, not what is
unconnected with benefit. The bridge to what is unconnected with
benefit has been cut by Tathāgatas. In two ways do Awakened Ones,
Blessed Ones, cross-question the monks: (Thinking,) “I will teach
the Dhamma” or “I will legislate a training rule for my
disciples.” So the Blessed One said to Ven. Ānanda, “Ānanda, is
that the sound of a mortar?”
Ven. Ānanda explained the matter to the Blessed One.
“Excellent, Ānanda, excellent is the victory won by you men of
integrity. People who come after will disdain meals of rice &
wheat with meat.”
Then Ven. Mahā Moggallāna went to the
Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed down to him, sat to one
side. As he was sitting there, he said to the Blessed One, “Lord,
Verañjā is now in the midst of a famine, a time of scarcity, the
crops white with blight and turned to straw. It isn’t easy to
maintain oneself by gleanings & patronage. Now, the underside of
this great Earth is moist & fertile, with a flavor like pure
honey. It would be good, lord, if I were to invert the Earth and
the monks will eat what nourishes the water plants.”
“But, Moggallāna, what about the creatures that live in
dependence on the Earth? What will they do?”
“Lord, I’ll conjure one hand to be like the great Earth and
I’ll transport the creatures living in dependence on the Earth
there. Then, with the other hand, I’ll invert the Earth.”
“Enough, Moggallāna. Don’t advocate inverting the Earth.
Living beings will get discombobulated.”
“Then it would be good, lord, if the entire Saṅgha of monks
went to the Northern Continent for alms.”
“But, Moggallāna, what about the monks without supranormal
power? What will they do?”
“I’ll make it so that the entire Saṅgha of monks will
go.”91
“Enough, Moggallāna. Don’t advocate having the entire Saṅgha
of monks go to the Northern Continent for alms.”
Now at that time, as Ven. Sāriputta was alone in seclusion,
this line of thinking arose in his awareness: “Of which of the
Awakened Ones, the Blessed Ones, was the holy life not
long-lasting? Of which of the Awakened Ones, the Blessed Ones,
was the holy life long-lasting?” Then in the late
afternoon, Ven. Sāriputta, arising from his seclusion, went to
the Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed down to him, sat to
one side. As he was sitting there, he said to the Blessed One,
“Just now, lord, as I was alone in seclusion, this line of
thinking arose in my awareness: ‘Of which of the Awakened Ones,
the Blessed Ones, was the holy life not long-lasting? Of which of
the Awakened Ones, the Blessed Ones, was the holy life
long-lasting?’”
“Sāriputta, the holy life of the Blessed Vipassin, the Blessed
Sikhin, & the Blessed Vessabhū was not long-lasting. The holy
life of the Blessed Kakusandha, the Blessed Konāgamana, & the
Blessed Kassapa was long-lasting.”
“What was the reason, lord, what was the cause, why the holy
life of the Blessed Vipassin, the Blessed Sikhin, & the Blessed
Vessabhū was not long-lasting? What was the reason, what was the
cause, why the holy life of the Blessed Kakusandha, the Blessed
Konāgamana, & the Blessed Kassapa was long-lasting?”
“Sāriputta, the Blessed Vipassin, the Blessed Sikhin, & the
Blessed Vessabhū were disinclined to teach the Dhamma in detail
to their disciples. Few were their dialogues, narratives of mixed
prose & verse, explanations, verses, spontaneous exclamations,
quotations, birth stories, amazing events, question & answer
sessions. They didn’t legislate a training rule for their
disciples; they didn’t expound a Pāṭimokkha. After the
disappearance of those Awakened Ones, Blessed Ones, and after the
disappearance of those who awakened after them, their later
disciples—of various names, various clans, various births, gone
forth from various families—quickly brought about the
disappearance of that holy life. Just as various flowers set out
on a tray but not tied together with string would get scattered,
dispersed, & disbanded by the wind—why is that? Because they were
not tied together with string. In the same way, after the
disappearance of those Awakened Ones, Blessed Ones, and after the
disappearance of those who awakened after them, their later
disciples—of various names, various clans, various births, gone
forth from various families—quickly brought about the
disappearance of that holy life.
“But those Awakened Ones, Blessed Ones, were not disinclined
to exhort their disciples after having encompassed the awareness
of their disciples with their own awareness. Once, Sāriputta,
Vessabhū the Blessed One, worthy & rightly self-awakened, in a
certain awe-inspiring forest grove, exhorted and instructed a
Saṅgha of one thousand monks: ‘Think this. Don’t think that. Pay
attention to this. Don’t pay attention to that. Abandon this.
Enter into and dwell in this.’ And so the minds of that Saṅgha of
one thousand monks—thus exhorted, thus instructed by Vessabhū the
Blessed One, worthy & rightly self-awakened—were, from lack of
clinging, released from effluents. And that was in the
awe-inspiring [time] of that awe-inspiring forest grove: If
anyone not without passion entered into it, for the most part his
hair would stand on end.
“That was the reason, Sāriputta, that was the cause, why the
holy life of the Blessed Vipassin, the Blessed Sikhin, & the
Blessed Vessabhū was not long-lasting.”
“But what, lord, was the reason, what was the cause, why the
holy life of the Blessed Kakusandha, the Blessed Konāgamana, &
the Blessed Kassapa was long-lasting?”
“Sāriputta, the Blessed Kakusandha, the Blessed Konāgamana, &
the Blessed Kassapa were not disinclined to teach the Dhamma in
detail to their disciples. Many were their dialogues, narratives
of mixed prose & verse, explanations, verses, spontaneous
exclamations, quotations, birth stories, amazing events, question
& answer sessions. They legislated a training rule for their
disciples; they expounded a Pāṭimokkha. After the disappearance
of those Awakened Ones, Blessed Ones, and after the disappearance
of those who awakened after them, their later disciples—of
various names, various clans, various births, gone forth from
various families—kept that holy life going for a long, long time.
Just as various flowers set out on a tray and tied together with
string would not get scattered, dispersed, or disbanded by the
wind—why is that? Because they were tied together with string. In
the same way, after the disappearance of those Awakened Ones,
Blessed Ones, and after the disappearance of those who awakened
after them, their later disciples—of various names, various
clans, various births, gone forth from various families—kept that
holy life going for a long, long time.
“That was the reason, Sāriputta, that was the cause, why the
holy life of the Blessed Kakusandha, the Blessed Konāgamana, &
the Blessed Kassapa was long-lasting.”
Then Ven. Sāriputta, getting up from his seat and arranging
his upper robe over his shoulder, raised his hands palm-to-palm
over his heart toward the Blessed One and said, “This is the
time, O Blessed One! This is the time, O One Well-Gone, for the
Blessed One to legislate a training rule for his disciples and to
expound a Pāṭimokkha, so that this holy life will be enduring &
long-lasting!”
“Wait, Sāriputta. Wait. The Tathāgata will know the time for
that. The Teacher does not lay down a training rule for his
disciples, he does not expound a Pāṭimokkha, as long as there are
no cases where the conditions that offer a foothold for the
effluents have arisen in the Saṅgha. But when there are
cases where the conditions that offer a foothold for the
effluents have arisen in the Saṅgha, then the Teacher lays down a
training rule for his disciples and expounds a Pāṭimokkha so as
to counteract those very conditions.
“There are no cases where the conditions that offer a foothold
for the effluents have arisen in the Saṅgha as long as the Saṅgha
has not become of long-standing. But when the Saṅgha has become
of long-standing, then there are cases where the conditions that
offer a foothold for the effluents arise in the Saṅgha, and the
Teacher then lays down a training rule for his disciples and
expounds a Pāṭimokkha so as to counteract those very
conditions.
“There are no cases where the conditions that offer a foothold
for the effluents have arisen in the Saṅgha as long as the Saṅgha
has not become great in size. But when the Saṅgha has become
great in size, then there are cases where the conditions that
offer a foothold for the effluents arise in the Saṅgha, and the
Teacher then lays down a training rule for his disciples and
expounds a Pāṭimokkha so as to counteract those very
conditions.
“There are no cases where the conditions that offer a foothold
for the effluents have arisen in the Saṅgha as long as the Saṅgha
has no great material gains. But when the Saṅgha has great
material gains, then there are cases where the conditions that
offer a foothold for the effluents arise in the Saṅgha, and the
Teacher then lays down a training rule for his disciples and
expounds a Pāṭimokkha so as to counteract those very
conditions.92
“Free from infection, Sāriputta, is this Saṅgha of monks. Free
from drawbacks, without defect, pure, bright, it stands in the
heartwood. Of these five hundred monks, Sāriputta, the most
backward is a stream-winner, never again destined for the lower
realms, certain, headed for self-awakening.”
Then the Blessed One addressed Ven. Ānanda,
“It is the custom of Tathāgatas, Ānanda, not to leave on a tour
of the countryside without going to see those who invited them to
dwell for the Rains. Come, Ānanda, we’ll go to see the Verañjā
brahman.”
“As you say, lord,” Ven. Ānanda responded to the Blessed
One.
“Then, adjusting his lower robe and taking his bowl & robe,
the Blessed One, together with Ven. Ānanda as his companion, went
to the Verañjā brahman’s home. On arrival, he sat down on a seat
laid out. Then the Verañjā brahman went to the Blessed One and,
on arrival, having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As he was
sitting there, the Blessed One said to him, “We were invited by
you to spend the Rains. We come to see you. We want to leave for
a tour of the countryside.”
“It’s true, lord, that you were invited by me to spend the
Rains. Nevertheless, what should have been given wasn’t given,
but that wasn’t because it didn’t exist or that we didn’t want to
give. But what could be done? Householders are very busy, with
many things to do. May Master Gotama acquiesce to my meal
tomorrow, together with the Saṅgha of monks.”
The Blessed One acquiesced with silence. Then—having
instructed, urged, roused, & encouraged the Verañjā brahman with
a talk on Dhamma—he got up from his seat and left.
Then the Verañjā brahman, as the night was ending—after having
exquisite staple & non-staple food prepared in his own
home—announced the time to the Blessed One: “It’s time, lord. The
meal is ready.”
Then, early in the morning, the Blessed One—having adjusted
his under robe and carrying his bowl & outer robe—went together
with the Saṅgha of monks to the Verañjā brahman’s home. On
arrival, he sat down on a seat laid out. The Verañjā brahman,
with his own hands, served & satisfied the Saṅgha of monks, with
the Buddha at its head, with exquisite staple & non-staple food.
Then, when the Blessed One had finished his meal and had rinsed
his bowl & hands, the Verañjā brahman presented the Blessed One
with a triple robe, and presented each monk with a single pair of
cloths. Then the Blessed One—having instructed, urged, roused, &
encouraged the Verañjā brahman with a talk on Dhamma—got up from
his seat and left.
Then the Blessed One, having stayed in Verañjā as long as he
liked, returning by Soreyya, Saṅkassa, & Kaṇṇakujja, went to
Payāgapatiṭṭhāna. On arrival, having crossed the River Ganges at
Payāgapatiṭṭhāna, he arrived at Vārāṇasī. Then, having stayed in
Vārāṇasī as long as he pleased, he went on a tour toward Vesālī.
Traveling by stages, he arrived at Vesālī. There he stayed near
Vesālī at the Gabled Hall in the Great Forest.
Now at that time not far from Vesālī was
Kalanda Village. There, a young man named Sudinna, a native of
Kalanda, was the son of a moneylender. Then Sudinna, together
with many friends, went to Vesālī on some business. And on that
occasion the Blessed One was sitting, teaching the Dhamma,
surrounded by a large assembly. Sudinna saw the Blessed One
sitting, teaching the Dhamma, surrounded by a large assembly, and
on seeing him, he thought, “What if I were to listen to the
Dhamma?” So he approached the assembly and, on arrival, sat to
one side. As he was sitting there, this thought occurred to him:
“As I understand the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One, it’s not
easy, living at home, to practice the holy life totally perfect,
totally pure, a polished shell. What if I, having shaved off my
hair & beard and putting on the ochre robe, were to go forth from
home into homelessness?”
Then the assembly—having been instructed, urged, roused, &
encouraged by the Blessed One’s talk on Dhamma—rose from their
seats and, bowing down to him, left, keeping him on their
right.
Then Sudinna, not long after the assembly had left, approached
the Blessed One and, on arrival, said to him, “As I understand
the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One, it’s not easy, living at
home, to practice the holy life totally perfect, totally pure, a
polished shell. Lord, I want—having shaved off my hair & beard
and putting on the ochre robe—to go forth from home into
homelessness. May I receive the Going-forth in the Blessed One’s
presence? May I receive the Acceptance?”
“Do you have your parents’ permission, Sudinna, to go forth
from home into homelessness?”
“No, lord, I don’t.”
“Sudinna, Tathāgatas do not give the Going-forth to anyone who
doesn’t have his parents’ permission.”
“Lord, I will do what needs to be done so that my parents will
give their permission for me to go forth from home into
homelessness.”
Then Sudinna, having settled his business in Vesālī, went to
his parents in Kalanda Village and, on arrival, said to them,
“Mom, Dad, as I understand the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One,
it’s not easy, living at home, to practice the holy life totally
perfect, totally pure, a polished shell. I want—having shaved off
my hair & beard and putting on the ochre robe—to go forth from
home into homelessness. Please give me your permission to go
forth from home into homelessness.”
When this was said, Sudinna’s parents said to him, “Sudinna,
dear, you’re our only son, dear & beloved, raised in comfort,
brought up in comfort. You know nothing of suffering. Even with
your death we would not want to be separated from you, so how
could we—while you’re alive—give our permission for you to go
forth from home into homelessness?”
A second time… A third time, Sudinna said to his parents,
“Mom, Dad, as I understand the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One,
it’s not easy, living at home, to practice the holy life totally
perfect, totally pure, a polished shell. I want—having shaved off
my hair & beard and putting on the ochre robe—to go forth from
home into homelessness. Please give me your permission to go
forth from home into homelessness.”
A third time, Sudinna’s parents said to him, “Sudinna, dear,
you’re our only son, dear & beloved, raised in comfort, brought
up in comfort. You know nothing of suffering. Even with your
death we would not want to be separated from you, so how could
we—while you’re alive—give our permission for you to go forth
from home into homelessness?”
Then Sudinna, not getting his parents’ permission to go forth
from home into homelessness, lay down right there on the bare
floor, (saying,) “Here will be my death or my Going-forth.” And
he went without food for one day… two days… three days, four…
five… six days. He went without food for seven days.
His parents said to him, “Sudinna, dear, you’re our only son,
dear & beloved, raised in comfort, brought up in comfort. You
know nothing of suffering. Even with your death we would not want
to be separated from you, so how could we—while you’re alive—give
our permission for you to go forth from home into homelessness?
Get up, dear. Eat, drink, & enjoy yourself. While eating,
drinking, & looking after yourself, you may enjoy yourself by
indulging in sensual pleasures & making merit. We don’t give our
permission for you to go forth from home into homelessness.”
When this was said, Sudinna remained silent.
A second time… A third time, Sudinna’s parents said to him,
“Sudinna, dear, you’re our only son, dear & beloved, raised in
comfort, brought up in comfort. You know nothing of suffering.
Even with your death we would not want to be separated from you,
so how could we—while you’re alive—give our permission for you to
go forth from home into homelessness? Get up, dear. Eat, drink, &
enjoy yourself. While eating, drinking, & looking after yourself,
you may enjoy yourself by indulging in sensual pleasures & making
merit. We don’t give our permission for you to go forth from home
into homelessness.”
A third time, Sudinna remained silent.
Then Sudinna’s friends went to him and, on arrival, said to
him, “Friend Sudinna, you are your parents’ only son.… Get up,
friend Sudinna. Eat, drink, & enjoy yourself.… Your parents don’t
give their permission for you to go forth from home into
homelessness.”
When this was said, Sudinna remained silent.
A second time… A third time, his friends said to him, “Friend
Sudinna, you are your parents’ only son.… Get up, friend Sudinna.
Eat, drink, & enjoy yourself.… Your parents don’t give their
permission for you to go forth from home into homelessness.”
A third time, Sudinna remained silent.
So Sudinna’s friends went to his parents and, on arrival, said
to them, “Mom, Dad, Sudinna is lying there on the bare floor,
(having said,) ‘Here will be my death or my Going-forth.’ If you
don’t give him your permission to go forth from home into
homelessness, right there will be his death. But if you do give
him your permission… then even when he has gone forth, you will
see him. And if he does not enjoy going forth from home into
homelessness, where else will he go? He’ll return right here. So
please give him permission to go forth from home into
homelessness.”
“Then, dears, we give our permission for Sudinna to go forth
from home into homelessness.”
Then Sudinna’s friends went to him and said, “Get up, friend
Sudinna. Your parents give their permission for you to go forth
from home into homelessness.”
Then Sudinna, (thinking,) “My parents give their permission
for me to go forth from home into homelessness,” joyful, elated,
rubbing his limbs with his hands, got up. Having regained
strength, he went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, having
bowed down to him, sat to one side. As he was sitting there, he
said to the Blessed One, “I have received my parents’ permission,
lord, to go forth from home into homelessness. May the Blessed
One give me the Going-forth!”
Then Sudinna the clansman obtained the Going-forth in the
Blessed One’s presence, he obtained the Acceptance. And not long
afterwards, Ven. Sudinna undertook this ascetic observance: He
was a wilderness dweller, one who went for alms, one who wore
cast-off cloth, and one who bypassed no donors. He lived in
dependence on a certain Vajjian village.
Now, on that occasion Vajji was in the midst of famine, a time
of scarcity, the crops white with blight and turned to straw. It
wasn’t easy to maintain oneself by gleanings & patronage. The
thought occurred to Ven. Sudinna, “Vajji is now in the midst of a
famine, a time of scarcity, the crops white with blight and
turned to straw. It isn’t easy to maintain oneself by gleanings &
patronage. Now, many are my relatives in Vesālī who are
prosperous, with great treasures, great resources, with vast
amounts of gold & silver, vast numbers of possessions &
requisites, vast resources in grain. What if I were to live in
dependence on my relatives? My relatives, in dependence on me,
would give gifts and make merit. The monks would receive gains,
and I wouldn’t be exhausted in going for alms.”
So, putting his lodgings in order and, carrying his bowl &
robes, Ven. Sudinna set out wandering toward Vesālī. Wandering by
stages, he eventually arrived at Vesālī. There he stayed near
Vesālī at the Gabled Hall in the Great Forest. His relatives
heard, “Sudinna the native of Kalanda, they say, has arrived in
Vesālī.” They brought him 60 pots of food-offerings. Then, after
sharing those 60 pots of food-offerings with the monks, Ven.
Sudinna early in the morning—having adjusted his under robe and
carrying his bowl & outer robe—went into Kalanda Village for
alms. As he went for alms from house to house in Kalanda Village
without bypassing any donor, he came to his own father’s
house.
Just then a slave woman belonging to one of his relatives was
about to throw away some day-old porridge. So Ven. Sudinna said
to her, “Sister, if that’s to be thrown away, pour it here into
my bowl.” While she was pouring the day-old porridge into this
bowl, she recognized his hands, feet, & voice. So she went to his
mother and said, “May it please you to know, my lady, that
master-son Sudinna has arrived.”
“Hey, if what you say is true, I give you your freedom!”
Now at that time Ven. Sudinna was sitting by the foot of a
wall, eating the day-old porridge. His father, coming from work,
saw him sitting by the foot of the wall, eating the day-old
porridge, so he went to him and said, “Sudinna, my dear, isn’t
there… What? You’re eating day-old porridge? Don’t you have your
own home to go to?”
“We went to your house, householder, which is where we got
this day-old porridge.”
Then Ven. Sudinna’s father, taking Ven. Sudinna by the arm,
said to him,
“Come, dear Sudinna. Let’s go home.”
So Ven. Sudinna went to his father’s home and, on arrival, sat
down on a seat laid out. Then his father said to him, “Eat, dear
Sudinna.”
“Enough, householder. My meal for today is finished.”
“In that case, dear Sudinna, acquiesce to the meal for
tomorrow.”
So Ven. Sudinna acquiesced in silence and—getting up from his
seat—left.
Then, as the night was ending, Ven. Sudinna’s mother, after
having had the floor smeared with fresh cow dung, had two heaps
made—one of gold, one of silver—so large that a man standing on
the near side couldn’t see a man standing on the far side, and a
man standing on the far side couldn’t see a man standing on the
near. Hiding them behind screens, she set out a seat between
them, surrounded by a curtain. Addressing Ven. Sudinna’s former
wife, she said to her, “Come, daughter-in-law. Adorn yourself in
the ornaments that our son, Sudinna, used to find dear &
loveable.”
“As you say, lady,” Ven. Sudinna’s former wife responded to
his mother.
Then, early in the morning, Ven. Sudinna—having adjusted his
under robe and carrying his bowl & outer robe—went to his
father’s house and, on arrival, sat down on the seat laid out.
Then his father, revealing the heaps, said to him, “This, my dear
Sudinna, is your mother’s inheritance, the dowry for the woman.
The other is your father’s; the other, your
grandfather’s.93
Come, my dear Sudinna. Revert to the lower life.
Enjoy wealth and make merit!”
“I’m unable to do that, Dad. I can’t. Delighted I lead the
holy life.”
A second time… A third time, Ven. Sudinna’s father said to
him, “This, my dear Sudinna, is your mother’s inheritance, the
dowry for the woman. The other is your father’s; the other, your
grandfather’s. Come, my dear Sudinna. Revert to the lower life.
Enjoy wealth and make merit!”
“Householder, I will tell you what to do with that, if you
won’t take offense.”
“Speak, dear Sudinna.”
“In that case, householder, having had huge bags of hemp cloth
made and having filled them with this gold & silver, have them
loaded on carts and hauled away to be dumped midstream in the
River Ganges. Why is that? So that any fear, terror,
horripilation, or lack of protection coming from this (wealth)
won’t happen to you.”
When this was said, Ven. Sudinna’s father was displeased,
(thinking,) “How can my son Sudinna speak in that way?”
Then Ven. Sudinna’s father addressed Ven. Sudinna’s former
wife, “In that case, daughter-in-law, dear & beloved, perhaps my
son Sudinna will do as you say.”
Then, clasping Ven. Sudinna’s feet, his former wife said to
him, “What are they like, dear master-son: those nymphs for whose
sake you lead the holy life?”
“Sister, we don’t lead the holy life for the sake of
nymphs.”
“Today he calls me ‘sister’!” And she fell down right there in
a faint.
Then Ven. Sudinna said to his father, “Householder, if there’s
food to be given, then give it. Don’t harass us.”
“Eat, then, my dear Sudinna.”
So, with their own hands, Ven. Sudinna’s mother & father
served and satisfied him with exquisite staple & non-staple
foods. When he had finished his meal and had rinsed his bowl &
hands, his mother said to him, “Sudinna, dear, this family is
prosperous, with great treasures, great resources, with vast
amounts of gold & silver, vast numbers of possessions &
requisites, vast resources in grain. Come, my dear Sudinna.
Revert to the lower life. Enjoy wealth and make merit!”
“I’m unable to do that, Mom. I can’t. Delighted I lead the
holy life.”
A second time… A third time, Ven. Sudinna’s mother said to
him, “Sudinna, dear, this family is prosperous, with great
treasures, great resources, with vast amounts of gold & silver,
vast numbers of possessions & requisites, vast resources in
grain. In that case, give at least your seed. Don’t let the
Licchavis confiscate our heirless property!”
“That, Mom, I can do.”
“Where are you living now, Sudinna dear?”
“In the Great Forest, Mom.”
Then Ven. Sudinna got up from his seat and left.
Then Ven. Sudinna’s mother said to his former wife, “In that
case, daughter-in-law, tell me when you have your period and your
menstrual flow begins.”
“As you say, lady,” Ven. Sudinna’s former wife responded to
his mother.
Then, not long afterwards, she had her period and her
menstrual flow began. So she said to Ven. Sudinna’s mother, “I’m
having my period, lady. My menstrual flow has begun.”
“In that case, daughter-in-law, adorn yourself in the
ornaments that our son, Sudinna, used to find dear &
loveable.”
Then Ven. Sudinna’s mother, with his former wife in tow, went
to Ven. Sudinna in the Great Forest. On arrival, she said to him,
“Sudinna, dear, this family is prosperous, with great treasures,
great resources, with vast amounts of gold & silver, vast numbers
of possessions & requisites, vast resources in grain. Come, my
dear Sudinna. Revert to the lower life. Enjoy wealth and make
merit!”
“I’m unable to do that, Mom. I can’t. Delighted I lead the
holy life.”
A second time… A third time, Ven. Sudinna’s mother said to
him, “Sudinna, dear, this family is prosperous, with great
treasures, great resources, with vast amounts of gold & silver,
vast numbers of possessions & requisites, vast resources in
grain. In that case, give at least your seed. Don’t let the
Licchavis confiscate our heirless property!”
“That, Mom, I can do.”
So, taking his former wife by the arm and plunging into the
Great Forest—the training rule not having been legislated, and
not seeing the drawbacks—he had sexual intercourse with her three
times. From that, she became pregnant.
The Earth Devas cried out: “How free from infection was the
Saṅgha of monks, how free from drawbacks! Yet infection has been
brought into being, drawbacks have been brought into being, by
Sudinna, the native of Kalanda!” On hearing the Earth Devas’ cry,
the Devas of the Four Great Kings took up the cry… the Devas of
the Thirty-three… the Devas of the Hours… the Contented Devas…
the Devas Delighting in Creation… the Devas Wielding Power over
the Creations of Others… the Devas of Brahmā’s Retinue took up
the cry: “How free from infection was the Saṅgha of monks, how
free from drawbacks! But infection has been brought into being,
drawbacks have been brought into being, by Sudinna, the native of
Kalanda!”
Then Ven. Sudinna’s former wife, with the ripening of the
fetus, gave birth to a son. Ven. Sudinna’s companions gave the
child the name “Seed,” gave Ven. Sudinna’s former wife the name,
“Seed-mother,” and gave Ven. Sudinna the name, “Seed-father.”
They both [son & mother], at a later time, going forth from home
into homelessness, realized arahantship.
Then Ven. Sudinna became anxious & remorseful: “What a loss
for me, and not a gain! How ill gotten by me, and not well
gotten!—that having gone forth into this well expounded Dhamma &
Vinaya, I wasn’t able to live the holy life completely & purely!”
And from that anxiety & remorse, Ven. Sudinna became thin,
wretched, unattractive, & pale, his body covered with veins;
melancholic, depressed, miserable, unhappy, remorseful, &
brooding.
His friends said to him, “Before, friend Sudinna, you were
attractive, your faculties bright, your complexion pure & clear.
But now you are thin, wretched, unattractive, & pale, your body
covered with veins; melancholic, depressed, miserable, unhappy,
remorseful, & brooding. Could it be that you’re leading the holy
life dissatisfied?”
“It’s not the case, friends, that I’m leading the holy life
dissatisfied. It’s that there’s an evil deed I have done. I have
indulged in sexual intercourse with my former wife. Because of
that, I am anxious & remorseful: ‘What a loss for me, and not a
gain! How ill gotten by me, and not well gotten!—that having gone
forth into this well expounded Dhamma & Vinaya, I wasn’t able to
live the holy life completely & purely!’
“Then there’s good reason for you to be anxious, good reason
to be remorseful, in that you—having gone forth into this well
expounded Dhamma & Vinaya—haven’t been able to live the holy life
completely & purely! Friend, hasn’t the Blessed One taught the
Dhamma in many ways for the sake of dispassion and not for
passion; for unfettering and not for fettering; for freedom from
clinging and not for clinging? Yet here, while he has taught the
Dhamma for dispassion, you set your heart on passion; while he
has taught the Dhamma for unfettering, you set your heart on
being fettered; while he has taught the Dhamma for freedom from
clinging, you set your heart on clinging.
“Friend, hasn’t the Blessed One taught the Dhamma in many ways
for the fading of passion, the subduing of intoxication, the
elimination of thirst, the uprooting of attachment, the severing
of the round, the ending of craving, dispassion, cessation,
unbinding? Hasn’t he in many ways advocated abandoning sensual
pleasures, comprehending sensual perceptions, subduing sensual
thirst, destroying sensual thoughts, calming sensual fevers?
“Friend, this neither inspires faith in the faithless nor
increases the faithful. Rather, it inspires lack of faith in the
faithless and wavering in some of the faithful.”
Then the monks, having rebuked Ven. Sudinna in many ways,
informed the Blessed One of this matter. So the Blessed
One—having, from this cause, from this incident, called a meeting
of the Saṅgha of monks—questioned Ven. Sudinna: “So is it true,
Sudinna, that you indulged in sexual intercourse with your former
wife?”
“It’s true, O Blessed One.”
Then the Awakened One, the Blessed One, rebuked him:
“Worthless man, it is unseemly, out of line, unsuitable, and
unworthy of a contemplative; improper and not to be done. How
could you, worthless man, having gone forth into this well
expounded Dhamma & Vinaya, not be able to live the holy life
completely & purely?
“Worthless man, haven’t I taught the Dhamma in many ways for
the sake of dispassion and not for passion; for unfettering and
not for fettering; for freedom from clinging and not for
clinging? Yet here, while I have taught the Dhamma for
dispassion, you set your heart on passion; while I have taught
the Dhamma for unfettering, you set your heart on being fettered;
while I have taught the Dhamma for freedom from clinging, you set
your heart on clinging.
“Worthless man, haven’t I taught the Dhamma in many ways for
the fading of passion, the subduing of intoxication, the
elimination of thirst, the uprooting of attachment, the severing
of the round, the ending of craving, dispassion, cessation,
unbinding? Haven’t I in many ways advocated abandoning sensual
pleasures, comprehending sensual perceptions, subduing sensual
thirst, destroying sensual thoughts, calming sensual fevers?
“Worthless man, it would be better that your penis be stuck
into the mouth of a fanged snake, terrifyingly poisonous, than
into a woman’s vagina. It would be better that your penis be
stuck into the mouth of a black viper than into a woman’s vagina.
It would be better that your penis be stuck into a pit of burning
embers, blazing & glowing, than into a woman’s vagina. Why is
that? For that reason you would undergo death or
death-like suffering, but you would not on that account, at the
breakup of the body, after death, fall into a plane of
deprivation, a bad destination, a lower realm, hell. But for
this reason you would, at the breakup of the body, after
death, fall into a plane of deprivation, a bad destination, a
lower realm, hell.
“In doing that, worthless man, you enter into what is not true
Dhamma, the act of the village, the act of the vile, a gross
offense, what has to end in washing up, secrecy, the coupling of
a couple.
“Worthless man, you are the first-doer, the forerunner, of
many unskillful acts.
“Worthless man, this neither inspires faith in the faithless
nor increases the faithful. Rather, it inspires lack of faith in
the faithless and wavering in some of the faithful.”
Then the Blessed One, having in many ways rebuked Ven.
Sudinna, having spoken in dispraise of being burdensome,
demanding, arrogant, discontented, entangled, & indolent; in many
ways having spoken in praise of being unburdensome, undemanding,
modest, content, scrupulous, austere, gracious, self-effacing, &
energetic; having given a Dhamma talk on what is seemly and
becoming for monks, addressed the monks:
“In that case, monks, I will legislate a training rule for the
monks with ten aims in mind: the excellence of the Saṅgha, the
comfort of the Saṅgha, the curbing of the impudent, the comfort
of well-behaved monks, the restraint of effluents related to the
present life, the prevention of effluents related to the next
life, the arousing of faith in the faithless, the increase of the
faithful, the establishment of the true Dhamma, and the fostering
of discipline.
“And this is how, monks, you should recite this training rule:
‘Should any monk engage in sexual intercourse, he is defeated
and no longer in affiliation.’”
And that is how this training rule was [first] legislated by
the Blessed One.
The ideals that the Buddha cited in his rebuke of Ven.
Sudinna—such as contentment, modesty, austerity, and
energy—were repeated each time he legislated a rule for the
Pāṭimokkha. They are important to keep in mind, for as we will
see, the Buddha often legislated these rules in response to
complaints from the laity or from the monks or nuns. This has
given rise to the impression that his rules were determined by
public opinion. This impression is mistaken because, as we will
also see, there were instances where his rules went against the
majority view of public opinion, and—in a few cases—even met
with resistance from the monks and nuns. If we search for a
constant theme in the legislation of the rules, we have to look
to this list of ideals—some of which, the Buddha noted, derive
from the traditions of the noble ones dating far back to
ancient times.
“These four traditions of the noble ones—original,
long-standing, traditional, ancient, unadulterated, unadulterated
from the beginning—are not open to suspicion, will never be open
to suspicion, and are unfaulted by knowledgeable contemplatives &
brahmans. Which four?
“There is the case where a monk is content with any old robe
cloth at all. He speaks in praise of being content with any old
robe cloth at all. He doesn’t, for the sake of robe cloth, do
anything unseemly or inappropriate. Not getting cloth, he isn’t
agitated. Getting cloth, he uses it unattached to it,
uninfatuated, guiltless, seeing the drawbacks (of attachment to
it), and discerning the escape from them. He doesn’t, on account
of his contentment with any old robe cloth at all, exalt himself
or disparage others. In this he is diligent, deft, alert, &
mindful. This is said to be a monk standing firm in the ancient,
original traditions of the noble ones.
[Similarly with almsfood & lodging.]
“And further, the monk finds pleasure & delight in developing
(skillful qualities), finds pleasure & delight in abandoning
(unskillful qualities). He doesn’t, on account of his pleasure &
delight in developing & abandoning, exalt himself or disparage
others. In this he is diligent, deft, alert, & mindful. This is
said to be a monk standing firm in the ancient, original
traditions of the noble ones.”
“These are the four traditions of the noble ones—original,
long-standing, traditional, ancient, unadulterated, unadulterated
from the beginning—which are not open to suspicion, will never be
open to suspicion, and are unfaulted by knowledgeable
contemplatives & brahmans.”
Here are a few examples of how the Buddha legislated rules
sometimes in response to complaints, sometimes on his own
initiative.
Now at that time the Buddha, the Blessed One, was dwelling
near Rājagaha on Vulture Peak Mountain. And at that time the
wanderers of other persuasions, gathering on the fourteenth or
fifteenth (day), and on the eighth (day) of the fortnight, spoke
Dhamma. The people went to them to hear the Dhamma. They gained
affection for the wanderers of other persuasions, gained
confidence in them, and the wanderers of other persuasions gained
a following.
Then, as the King of Magadha, Seniya Bimbisāra, was alone in
seclusion, this train of thought arose in his awareness: “At this
time the wanderers of other persuasions, gathering on the
fourteenth or fifteenth (day), and on the eighth (day) of the
fortnight, speak Dhamma. The people go to them to hear the
Dhamma, and they gain affection for the wanderers of other
persuasions, gain confidence in them, and the wanderers of other
persuasions gain a following. What if the masters were also to
gather on the fourteenth or fifteenth (day), and on the eighth
(day) of the fortnight?”
So he went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed
down to him, sat to one side. As he was sitting there, he said to
the Blessed One, “Just now, lord, as I was alone in seclusion,
this train of thought arose in my awareness: ‘At this time the
wanderers of other persuasions, gathering on the fourteenth or
fifteenth (day), and on the eighth (day) of the fortnight, speak
Dhamma. The people go to them to hear the Dhamma, and they gain
affection for the wanderers of other persuasions, gain confidence
in them, and the wanderers of other persuasions gain a following.
What if the masters were to also to gather on the fourteenth or
fifteenth (day), and on the eighth (day) of the fortnight?’”
Then the Blessed One instructed, urged, roused, & encouraged
the King of Magadha, Seniya Bimbisāra, with a Dhamma talk. Having
been instructed, urged, roused, & encouraged by the Blessed One
with a Dhamma talk, he got up from his seat and, having bowed
down to the Blessed One, circumambulated him, keeping him to his
right, and left.
Then the Blessed One, having given a Dhamma talk with regard
to this cause, to this incident, addressed the monks: “Monks, I
allow you to gather on the fourteenth or fifteenth (day), and on
the eighth (day) of the fortnight.”
Now at that time the monks, (thinking,) “It has been allowed
by the Blessed One to gather on the fourteenth or fifteenth
(day), and on the eighth (day) of the fortnight,” gathering on
the fourteenth or fifteenth (day), and on the eighth (day) of the
fortnight, sat in silence. The people came to them to hear the
Dhamma. They criticized & complained & spread it about: “How can
these Sakyan-son monks, gathering on the fourteenth or fifteenth
(day), and on the eighth (day) of the fortnight, sit in silence
like dumb pigs? Shouldn’t Dhamma be spoken when they gather?”
The monks heard the people criticizing & complaining &
spreading it about. So the monks reported the matter to the
Blessed One. The Blessed One, having given a Dhamma talk with
regard to this cause, to this incident, addressed the monks:
“Monks, I allow you, having gathered on the fourteenth or
fifteenth (day), and on the eighth (day) of the fortnight, to
speak Dhamma.”
Then, as the Blessed One was alone in seclusion, this train of
thought arose in his awareness: “What if I were to allow the
monks a recitation of the Pāṭimokkha of the rules I have laid
down for them? That will be their Uposatha transaction.”
When it was evening, the Blessed One rose from seclusion
and—having given a Dhamma talk with regard to this cause, this
incident—addressed the monks: “Monks, just now, as I was alone in
seclusion, this train of thought arose in my awareness: ‘What if
I were to allow the monks a recitation of the Pāṭimokkha of the
rules I have laid down for them? That will be their Uposatha
transaction.’
“Monks, I allow you to recite the Pāṭimokkha.”
And at that time, the Rains residence had
not been legislated by the Blessed One for the monks. So at that
time, the monks would go on walking tours in the hot season, the
cold season, & the rainy season.
People criticized & complained & spread it about, “How can the
Sakyan-son contemplatives go on walking tours in the hot season,
the cold season, & the rainy season—crushing green grass, harming
one-facultied life, and bringing about the destruction of many
small creatures? Even these wanderers of other religions with
poorly expounded Dhammas settle down and stay put for the Rains
residence. Even the birds, having made nests in the tops of
trees, settle down and stay put for the Rains residence.
“But these Sakyan-son contemplatives go on walking tours in
the hot season, the cold season, & the rainy season—crushing
green grass, harming one-facultied life, and bringing about the
destruction of many small creatures.”
The monks heard the people criticizing & complaining &
spreading it about. Then the monks reported the matter to the
Blessed One.
The Blessed One, having given a Dhamma talk with regard to
this cause, this incident, addressed the monks: “Monks, I allow
you to enter for the Rains.”
When the Buddha legislated the Pāṭimokkha rule against
eating after noon, not all the monks were happy with it.
Then, in the evening, Ven. Udāyin left seclusion and went to
the Blessed One. On arrival, having bowed down to him, he sat to
one side. As he was sitting there he said to the Blessed One:
“Just now, lord, as I was alone in seclusion, this train of
thought arose in my awareness: ‘So many painful things has the
Blessed One taken away from us! So many pleasant things has he
brought us! So many unskillful qualities has the Blessed One
taken away from us! So many skillful qualities has he brought
us!’ For in the past, lord, we used to eat in the morning, in the
evening, and in the day at the wrong time (the afternoon). Then
there was the time when the Blessed One addressed the monks,
saying, ‘Monks, please discontinue that daytime meal at the wrong
time.’ At the time I was upset, at the time I was sad,
(thinking,) ‘The exquisite staple & non-staple foods that
faithful householders give us during the day at the wrong time:
even that the Blessed One has us abandon; even that the One
Well-Gone has us relinquish!’ But, out of consideration for our
love & respect for the Blessed One, out of consideration for
shame & fear of wrongdoing, we abandoned that daytime meal at the
wrong time.
“So we ate both in the evening & in the morning. Then there
was the time when the Blessed One addressed the monks, saying,
‘Monks, please discontinue that evening meal at the wrong time.’
At the time I was upset, at the time I was sad, (thinking,) ‘The
more exquisitely prepared of our two meals: even that the Blessed
One has us abandon; even that the One Well-Gone has us
relinquish!’ In the past, lord, a man—obtaining some soup during
the day—would say to his wife, ‘Put this aside and we will all
eat it together in the evening.’ (Almost) all food preparation is
done in the evening, and almost none during the day. But, out of
consideration for our love & respect for the Blessed One, out of
consideration for shame & fear of wrongdoing, we abandoned that
evening meal at the wrong time.
“In the past, lord, monks wandering for alms in the pitch
black of the night have walked into a waste-water pool, fallen
into a cesspit, stumbled over a thorn patch, or stumbled over a
sleeping cow. They have encountered young hooligans on the way to
or from a crime. They have been propositioned by women. Once I
went for alms in the pitch black of night. A woman washing a pot
saw me by a lightning flash and, on seeing me, screamed out: ‘I’m
done for! A demon is after me!’ When this was said, I said to
her, ‘I’m no demon, sister. I’m a monk waiting for alms.’ ‘Then
you’re a monk whose daddy’s dead and whose mommy’s dead. Better
for you, monk, that your belly were slit open with a sharp
butcher’s knife than this prowling for alms for your belly’s sake
in the pitch black of the night!” On recollecting that, lord, the
thought occurred to me: ‘So many painful things has the Blessed
One taken away from us! So many pleasant things has he brought
us! So many unskillful qualities has the Blessed One taken away
from us! So many skillful qualities has he brought us!’”
“In the same way, Udāyin, there are some worthless men who,
when I tell them, ‘Abandon this,’ say: ‘What? Over this little,
trifling thing? He’s too much of a stickler, this contemplative.’
They don’t abandon it. They’re rude to me and to the monks keen
on training. For them that’s a strong snare, a thick snare, a
heavy snare, an unrotting snare, and a thick yoke.…
“Now there are some clansmen who, when I tell them, ‘Abandon
this,’ say: ‘What? The Blessed One has us abandon, the One
Well-Gone has us relinquish this little, trifling thing?’ But
they abandon it and are not rude to me or to the monks keen on
training. Having abandoned it, they live unconcerned, unruffled,
their wants satisfied, with their mind like a wild deer. For them
that’s a weak snare, a feeble snare, a rotting snare, an
insubstantial snare.”
I have heard that on one occasion the
Blessed One was wandering on a tour of Kāsi with a large Saṅgha
of monks. There he addressed the monks: “I abstain from the
nighttime meal. As I am abstaining from the nighttime meal, I
sense next-to-no illness, next-to-no affliction, lightness,
strength, & and comfortable abiding. Come, now. You, too, abstain
from the nighttime meal. As you are abstaining from the nighttime
meal, you, too, will sense next-to-no illness, next-to-no
affliction, lightness, strength, & and comfortable abiding.”
“As you say, lord,” the monks responded to him.
Then, as he was wandering by stages in Kāsi, the Blessed One
eventually arrived at a Kāsi town called Kīṭāgiri. And there he
stayed in the Kāsi town, Kīṭāgiri.
Now at that time the monks led by Assaji &
Punabbasu94
were residing in Kīṭāgiri. Then a large number of
monks went to them and, on arrival, said to them, “The Blessed
One and the Saṅgha of monks abstain from the nighttime meal. As
they are abstaining from the nighttime meal, they sense
next-to-no illness, next-to-no affliction, lightness, strength, &
and comfortable abiding. Come now, friends. You, too, abstain
from the nighttime meal. As you are abstaining from the nighttime
meal, you, too, will sense next-to-no illness, next-to-no
affliction, lightness, strength, & and comfortable abiding.”
When this was said, the monks led by Assaji & Punabbasu said
to those monks, “Friends, we eat in the evening, in the morning,
& in the wrong-time during the day. As we are eating in the
evening, and in the morning, & in the wrong time during the day,
we sense next-to-no illness, next-to-no affliction, lightness,
strength, & and comfortable abiding. Why should we, abandoning
what is immediately visible, chase after something subject to
time? We will eat in the evening, in the morning, & in the wrong
time during the day.”
When they were unable to convince the monks led by Assaji &
Punabbasu, those monks went to the Blessed One [and told him what
had happened].
Then the Blessed One told a certain monk, “Come, monk. In my
name, call the monks led by Assaji & Punabbasu, saying, ‘The
Teacher calls you, friends.’”
“As you say, lord,” the monk answered and went to the monks
led by Assaji & Punabbasu. On arrival, he said, “The Teacher
calls you, friends.”
“As you say, friend,” the monks led by Assaji & Punabbasu
replied. Then they went to the Blessed One and, on arrival,
having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As they were sitting
there, the Blessed One said to him, “Is it true, monks, that a
large number of monks went to you… and you said, ‘…Why should we,
abandoning what is immediately visible, chase after something
subject to time? We will eat in the evening, in the morning, & in
the wrong time during the day.’”
“Yes, lord.”
“Monks, have you ever understood me to teach the Dhamma in
this way: ‘Whatever a person experiences—pleasant, painful, or
neither-pleasant-nor-painful—his unskillful qualities decrease
and his skillful qualities grow’?”
“No, lord.”
“And haven’t you understood me to teach the Dhamma in this
way: ‘For someone feeling a pleasant feeling of this
sort, unskillful qualities grow and skillful qualities decrease.
But there is the case where, for someone feeling a pleasant
feeling of that sort, unskillful qualities decrease and
skillful qualities grow. For someone feeling a painful feeling of
this sort, unskillful qualities grow and skillful qualities
decrease. But there is the case where, for someone feeling a
painful feeling of that sort, unskillful qualities decrease and
skillful qualities grow. For someone feeling a
neither-pleasant-nor-painful feeling of this sort, unskillful
qualities grow and skillful qualities decrease. But there is the
case where, for someone feeling a neither-pleasant-nor-painful
feeling of that sort, unskillful qualities decrease and skillful
qualities grow.’”
“Yes, lord.”
“Good, monks. And if it were not known by me—not seen, not
observed, not realized, not touched through discernment—that ‘For
someone feeling a pleasant feeling of this sort, unskillful
qualities grow and skillful qualities decrease,’ then would it be
fitting for me, not knowing that, to say, ‘Abandon that sort of
pleasant feeling’?”
“No, lord.”
“But because it is known by me—seen, observed, realized,
touched through discernment—that ‘For someone feeling a pleasant
feeling of this sort, unskillful qualities grow and skillful
qualities decrease,’ I therefore say, ‘Abandon that sort of
pleasant feeling.’
“If it were not known by me—not seen, not observed, not
realized, not touched through discernment—that ‘For someone
feeling a pleasant feeling of this sort, unskillful qualities
decrease and skillful qualities grow,’ then would it be fitting
for me, not knowing that, to say, ‘Enter and remain in that sort
of pleasant feeling’?”
“No, lord.”
“But because it is known by me—seen, observed, realized,
touched through discernment—that ‘For someone feeling a pleasant
feeling of this sort, unskillful qualities decrease and skillful
qualities grow,’ I therefore say, ‘Enter and remain in that sort
of pleasant feeling.’
[Similarly for painful feelings and
neither-pleasant-nor-painful feelings.]
“Monks, I don’t say of all monks that they have a task to do
with heedfulness; nor do I say of all monks that they have no
task to do with heedfulness.
“Monks who are arahants, whose mental effluents are ended, who
have reached fulfillment, done the task, laid down the burden,
attained the true goal, totally destroyed the fetter of becoming,
and who are released through right gnosis: I don’t say of them
that they have a task to do with heedfulness. Why is that? They
have done their task with heedfulness. They are incapable of
being heedless. But as for monks in higher training, who have not
yet reached their hearts’ goal, who still aspire for the
unexcelled freedom from bondage: I say of them that they have a
task to do with heedfulness. Why is that? (I think:) ‘Perhaps
these venerable ones, when making use of suitable resting places,
associating with admirable friends, balancing their (mental)
faculties, will reach & remain in the supreme goal of the holy
life for which clansmen rightly go forth from home into
homelessness, knowing & realizing it for themselves in the
here-&-now.’ Envisioning this fruit of heedfulness for these
monks, I say that they have a task to do with heedfulness.
“Monks, I do not say that the attainment of gnosis is all at
once. Rather, the attainment of gnosis is after gradual training,
gradual action, gradual practice. And how is there the attainment
of gnosis after gradual training, gradual action, gradual
practice? There is the case where, when conviction has arisen,
one visits (a teacher). Having visited, one grows close. Having
grown close, one lends ear. Having lent ear, one hears the
Dhamma. Having heard the Dhamma, one remembers it. Remembering,
one penetrates the meaning of the teachings. Penetrating the
meaning, one comes to an agreement through pondering the
teachings. There being an agreement through pondering the
teachings, desire arises. When desire has arisen, one is willing.
When one is willing, one contemplates. Having contemplated, one
makes an exertion. Having made an exertion, one realizes with the
body the ultimate truth and, having penetrated it with
discernment, sees it.
“Now, monks, there hasn’t been that conviction, there hasn’t
been that visiting, there hasn’t been that growing close… that
lending ear… that hearing of the Dhamma… that remembering… that
penetration of the meaning of the teachings… that agreement
through pondering the teachings… that desire… that willingness…
that contemplation… that exertion. You have lost the way, monks.
You have gone the wrong way, monks. How far have you strayed,
foolish men, from this Dhamma & Discipline!
“Monks, there is a four-phrased statement that, when it is
recited, an observant man will in no long time learn the meaning
through discernment. I will recite it, and you learn it from
me.”
“But, lord, who are we to be learners of the Dhamma?”
“Monks, even with a teacher devoted to material things, an
heir of material things, who lives attached to material things,
this sort of haggling (by his students) wouldn’t be proper: ‘If
we get this, we’ll do it; if we don’t, we won’t.’ So how could it
be with regard to the Tathāgata, who dwells entirely detached
from material things?
“For a disciple who has conviction in the Teacher’s message &
lives to penetrate it, what accords with the Dhamma is this: ‘The
Blessed One is the Teacher, I am a disciple. He is the one who
knows, not I.’ For a disciple who has conviction in the Teacher’s
message & lives to penetrate it, the Teacher’s message is healing
& nourishing. For a disciple who has conviction in the Teacher’s
message & lives to penetrate it, what accords with the Dhamma is
this: ‘Gladly would I let the flesh & blood in my body dry up,
leaving just the skin, tendons, & bones, but if I have not
attained what can be reached through manly firmness, manly
persistence, manly striving, there will be no relaxing my
persistence.’ For a disciple who has conviction in the Teacher’s
message & lives to penetrate it, one of two fruits can be
expected: either gnosis here & now, or—if there be any remnant of
clinging-sustenance—non-return.”
That is what the Blessed One said. Gratified, the monks
delighted in the Blessed One’s words.
Although, as we have seen, the Buddha would sometimes lay
down rules in response to criticism from the laity, there were
also times when he would lay down rules forbidding behavior
that many lay people liked and admired. Here are two examples
of this principle. The first example illustrates an additional
point as well: Even though the Buddha would sometimes display
his psychic powers as a way of inspiring his listeners, he
couldn’t always trust disciples with psychic powers to share
his discretion as to when such powers should and shouldn’t be
displayed. So he had to forbid them from displaying their
powers to the laity in all situations.
Now at that time a costly block of sandalwood, from sandalwood
heartwood, accrued to the Rājagaha moneylender. The thought
occurred to him, “What if I were to have an alms bowl carved from
this block of sandalwood? The chips will be for my own enjoyment,
and I’ll give the bowl as a gift.” So the moneylender, having had
a bowl carved from the block of sandalwood, having looped a
string around it, having hung it from the top of a bamboo pole,
having had the bamboo pole fastened on top of a series of bamboo
poles, one on top of another, announced: “Any contemplative or
brahman who is an arahant with supranormal powers: Fetch down the
bowl and it is given to you.”
Then Pūraṇa Kassapa went to the Rājagaha moneylender and, on
arrival, said to him, “Because I am a worthy one with supranormal
powers, give me the bowl.”
“If, lord, you are a worthy one with supranormal powers, fetch
down the bowl and it is given to you.”
Then Makkhali Gosāla … Ajita Kesakambalin … Pakudha Kaccāyana
… Sañjaya Velaṭṭhaputta … Nigaṇṭha Nāṭaputta went to the Rājagaha
moneylender and, on arrival, said to him, “Because I am an
arahant with supranormal powers, give me the bowl.”
“If, lord, you are an arahant with supranormal powers, fetch
down the bowl and it is given to you.”
Now at that time, early in the morning, Ven. Mahā Moggallāna &
Ven. Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja—having adjusted their under robes and
each taking his robe & bowl—had gone into Rājagaha for alms. Ven.
Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja was an arahant with supranormal powers, and
Ven. Mahā Moggallāna was an arahant with supranormal powers. Then
Ven. Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja said to Ven. Mahā Moggallāna: “Go, friend
Moggallāna, and fetch down the bowl. That bowl is yours.” Then
Ven. Mahā Moggallāna said to Ven. Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja: “Go, friend
Bhāradvāja, and fetch down the bowl. That bowl is yours.”
So Ven. Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja, rising up into the sky, took the
bowl and circled three times around Rājagaha. Now at that time
the Rājagaha moneylender was standing in his house compound with
his wife & children, paying homage with his hands palm-to-palm
over his heart, (saying,) “May Master Bhāradvāja land right here
in our house compound.” So Ven. Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja landed in the
moneylender’s house compound. Then the moneylender, having taken
the bowl from Ven. Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja’s hand, having filled it
with costly non-staple foods, presented it to Ven. Piṇḍola
Bhāradvāja. Ven. Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja, taking the bowl, returned to
the monastery.
People, hearing that “Master Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja, they say, has
fetched down the moneylender’s bowl,” followed right after him,
making a shrill noise, a great noise. The Blessed One, hearing
the shrill noise, the great noise, asked Ven. Ānanda, “Ānanda,
what is that shrill noise, that great noise?”
“Ven. Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja has fetched down the Rājagaha
moneylender’s bowl, lord. People, hearing that ‘Master Piṇḍola
Bhāradvāja, they say, has fetched down the moneylender’s bowl,’
are following right after him, making a shrill noise, a great
noise. That is the shrill noise, the great noise, that the
Blessed One (hears).”
Then the Blessed One, with regard to this cause, to this
incident, had the Saṅgha of monks assembled and questioned Ven.
Piṇḍola Bhāradvāja: “Is it true, as they say, Bhāradvāja, that
you fetched down the moneylender’s bowl?”
“It’s true, lord.”
The Awakened One, the Blessed One, rebuked him: “It’s not
appropriate, Bhāradvāja, not fitting for a contemplative,
improper, and not to be done. How can you display a superior
human state, a wonder of supranormal power, to lay people for the
sake of a miserable wooden bowl? Just as a woman might expose her
sexual organ for the sake of a miserable wooden coin, so too have
you displayed a superior human state, a wonder of supranormal
power, to lay people for the sake of a miserable wooden
bowl.…
“Monks, A superior human state, a wonder of supranormal power,
should not be displayed to householders. Whoever should display
it: an offense of wrongdoing. Break this wooden bowl into pieces,
monks, and having reduced it to splinters, give them mixed in
ointment to the monks. And a wooden bowl is not to be used.
Whoever should use one: an offense of wrongdoing.”
At that time, the group led by Assaji &
Punabbasu were residents in Kīṭāgiri. Shameless & evil monks,
they engaged in bad habits like these: … They ate from the same
dish with wives of good families, daughters of good families,
girls of good families, daughters-in-law of good families, female
slaves of good families; drank from the same beaker, sat down on
the same seat, shared the same bench, shared the same mat, shared
the same blanket, shared the same mat & blanket.… They ate at the
wrong time, drank strong liquor, wore garlands, scents, &
cosmetics; they danced, they sang, they played instruments.… They
ran in front of elephants… horses… chariots. They ran forwards &
backwards. They whistled, they clapped their hands, wrestled,
boxed. Having spread out their outer robes as a stage, they said
to a dancing girl, “Dance here, sister.” They applauded her—and
engaged in many other bad habits.
“Now at that time a certain monk, having finished his Rains
residence among the people of Kāsi and on his way to Sāvatthī to
see the Blessed One, arrived at Kīṭāgiri. Early in the
morning—having adjusted his under robe and taking his bowl &
outer robe—he entered Kīṭāgiri for alms: gracious in the way he
approached and departed, looked forward and behind, drew in and
stretched out (his arm); his eyes downcast, his every movement
consummate. People seeing him said, “Who is this weakest of
weaklings, this dullest of dullards, this most snobbish of snobs?
Who, if this one approached, would even give him alms? Our
masters, the group led by Assaji & Punabbasu, are compliant,
genial, pleasing in conversation. They are the first to smile,
saying, ‘Come, you are welcome.’ They are not snobbish.
They are approachable. They are the first to speak. They
are the ones to whom alms should be given.”
At the request of one of the laymen of Kīṭāgiri, the monk
informed the Buddha of the situation there, and he instituted
an act of banishment against the followers of Assaji and
Punabbasu, on the grounds that they were “corrupting families”
with their ingratiating behavior:
“The Blessed One… addressed Ven. Sāriputta & Moggallāna, “Go
to Kīṭāgiri and, having gone there, impose a banishment
transaction on the monks who are followers of Assaji & Punabbasu
in Kīṭāgiri. They are your fellow students.”
“But, lord, how can we impose a banishment transaction on the
monks who are followers of Assaji & Punabbasu in Kīṭāgiri? They
are violent & rough.”
“In that case, go with many monks.”
“As you say, lord.”
After the banishment transaction was imposed on the
followers of Assaji and Punabbasu—requiring them to leave their
residence—they did not comply. Instead, they cursed and reviled
the monks who had imposed the transaction. So the Buddha had
the monks impose a further saṅghādisesa
offense on them to give them one more chance
to mend their ways. The Canon does not record whether the
affair was ever resolved.
The Buddha continued legislating rules, major and minor, for
many years. Some of them were included in the Pāṭimokkha, many
were not. Those not included there were gathered in other
sections of the Vinaya, called the Khandhakas. As the rules
grew in number, some of the monks found them overwhelming. In
response to the honest complaint of one such monk, the Buddha
affirmed that all the rules had a consistent set of principles
underlying them.
On one occasion the Blessed One was staying near Vesālī in the
Great Forest. Then a certain Vajjian monk went to him and, on
arrival, bowed down to him and sat to one side. As he was sitting
there, he said to the Blessed One, “Lord, this recitation of more
than 150 training rules comes every fortnight. I cannot train in
reference to them.”
“Monk, can you train in reference to the three trainings: the
training in heightened virtue, the training in heightened mind,
the training in heightened discernment?”
“Yes, lord, I can train in reference to the three trainings:
the training in heightened virtue, the training in heightened
mind, the training in heightened discernment.”
“Then train in reference to those three trainings: the
training in heightened virtue, the training in heightened mind,
the training in heightened discernment. As you train in
heightened virtue, heightened mind, & heightened discernment,
your passion, aversion, & delusion… will be abandoned. You—with
the abandoning of passion, the abandoning of aversion, the
abandoning of delusion—will not do anything unskillful or engage
in any evil.”
Later on, that monk trained in reference to heightened virtue,
heightened mind, & heightened discernment. His passion, aversion,
& delusion… were abandoned. He—with the abandoning of passion,
the abandoning of aversion, the abandoning of delusion—did not do
anything unskillful or engage in any evil.
Two of the rules regarding robe cloth, not included in the
Pāṭimokkha, were legislated in a way that reveals a great deal
about the Buddha as a person. The first incident below is
another example of a rule laid down, not in response to any
event, but from the Buddha’s own inspiration.
Then the Blessed One, having stayed at Rājagaha as long as he
liked, set out on a wandering tour toward the Southern Mountains.
He saw the fields of Magadha, divided into rectangles, divided
into rows, divided by dikes, divided by intersections. On seeing
them, he addressed Ven. Ānanda, “Ānanda, do you see the fields of
Magadha, divided into rectangles, divided into rows, divided by
dikes, divided by intersections?”
“Yes, lord.”
“Try to design robes in this pattern for the monks.”
“I will try, Blessed One.”
Then the Blessed One, having stayed in the Southern Mountains
for as long as he liked, returned to Rājagaha.
Then Ven. Ānanda, having procured robes for several monks,
went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, said to him, “Lord, may
the Blessed One look at the robes I have designed.”
Then the Blessed One, having given a Dhamma talk with regard
to this cause, to this incident, addressed the monks: “Monks,
Ānanda is wise. Ānanda has great discernment, in that he
understands in detail the meaning of a brief statement made by
me. He can make what is called a dike-piece, a half-dike piece, a
field plot, a half-field plot, a central section, sections next
to the central section, a throat piece, a calf piece, and arm
sections.95
They will be cut, made rough by the knife, suitable
for a contemplative, not envied by enemies. Monks, I allow a
cut-up outer robe, a cut-up upper robe, a cut-up lower robe.”
[The Buddha addresses the monks:]
“As I was traveling on the road from Rājagaha to Vesālī, I saw
many monks coming along loaded down with robe-cloth, having made
a mattress of robe-cloth on their heads and a mattress of
robe-cloth on their backs/shoulders and a mattress of robe-cloth
on their hips. Seeing them, I thought, ‘All too quickly have
these worthless men backslid into abundance in terms of
robe-cloth. What if I were to tie off a boundary, to set a limit
on robe-cloth for the monks?’
“Now at that time, during the cold winter middle-eight nights
[the four nights on either side of the full moon in February, the
coldest time of the year in northern India] when snow was
falling, I sat in the open air wearing one robe and was not cold.
Toward the end of the first watch I became cold. I put on a
second robe and was not cold. Toward the end of the middle watch
I became cold. I put on a third robe and was not cold. Toward the
end of the final watch, as dawn rose and the night smiled, I
became cold. I put on a fourth robe and was not cold. The thought
occurred to me, ‘Those in this Dhamma & Vinaya who are sons of
respectable families—sensitive to cold and afraid of the
cold—even they are able to get by with three robes. Suppose I
were to tie off a boundary, to set a limit on robe-cloth for the
monks and were to allow three robes.’ Monks, I allow you three
robes: a double-layer outer robe, a single-thickness upper robe,
and a single-thickness lower robe [thus, four layers of cloth].”
In addition to legislating rules for the Saṅgha, the Buddha
continued training the monks in the Dhamma, sometimes using
gentleness, sometimes strictness, and sometimes humor, as the
case required.
Then Ven. Upāli went to the Blessed One and, on arrival,
having bowed down to him, sat to one side. As he was sitting
there he said to the Blessed One, “Lord, I want to spend time in
isolated wilderness & forest lodgings.”
“Upāli, it’s not easy to endure isolated wilderness & forest
lodgings. It’s not easy to maintain seclusion, not easy to enjoy
being alone. The forests plunder, as it were, the mind of a monk
who has not gained concentration. Whoever would say, ‘I, without
having gained concentration, will spend time in isolated
wilderness & forest lodgings,’ of him it can be expected that he
will sink to the bottom or float away.
“Imagine, Upāli, a great freshwater lake. Then there would
come a great bull elephant, seven or seven and a half cubits
tall. The thought would occur to him, ‘What if I were to plunge
into this freshwater lake, to playfully squirt water into my ears
and along my back, and then—having playfully squirted water into
my ears and along my back, having bathed & drunk & come back
out—to go off as I please?’ So, having plunged into the
freshwater lake, he would playfully squirt water into his ears
and along his back, and then—having playfully squirted water into
his ears and along his back, having bathed & drunk & come back
out—he would go off as he pleased. Why is that? Because his large
body finds a footing in the depth.
“Then a rabbit or a cat would come along. The thought would
occur to it, ‘What’s the difference between me and a bull
elephant? What if I were to plunge into this freshwater lake, to
playfully squirt water into my ears and along my back, and
then—having playfully squirted water into my ears and along my
back, having bathed & drunk & come back out—to go off as I
please?’ So, without reflecting, he jumps rashly into the
freshwater lake, and of him it can be expected that he will
either sink to the bottom or float away. Why is that? Because his
small body doesn’t find a footing in the depth.
“In the same way, whoever would say, ‘I, without having gained
concentration, will spend time in isolated wilderness & forest
lodgings,’ of him it can be expected that he will sink to the
bottom or float away.”96
I have heard that on one occasion the
Blessed One was dwelling near Rājagaha, on Vulture Peak Mountain.
And on that occasion Ven. Soṇa was dwelling near Rājagaha in the
Cool Forest. Then, as Ven. Soṇa was meditating in seclusion
[after doing walking meditation until the skin of his soles was
split & bleeding], this train of thought arose in his awareness:
“Of the Blessed One’s disciples who have aroused their
persistence, I am one, but my mind is not released from effluents
through lack of clinging/sustenance. Now, my family has enough
wealth that it would be possible to enjoy wealth & make merit.
What if I were to disavow the training, return to the lower life,
enjoy wealth, & make merit?”
Then the Blessed One, as soon as he perceived with his
awareness the train of thought in Ven. Soṇa’s awareness,
disappeared from Vulture Peak Mountain—just as a strong man might
extend his flexed arm or flex his extended arm—appeared in the
Cool Forest right in front of Ven. Soṇa, and sat down on a
prepared seat. Ven. Soṇa, after bowing down to the Blessed One,
sat to one side. As he was sitting there, the Blessed One said to
him, “Just now, as you were meditating in seclusion, didn’t this
train of thought appear to your awareness: ‘Of the Blessed One’s
disciples who have aroused their persistence, I am one, but my
mind is not released from effluents.… What if I were to disavow
the training, return to the lower life, enjoy wealth, & make
merit?’”
“Yes, lord.”
“Now what do you think, Soṇa? Before, when you were a
house-dweller, were you skilled at playing the lute?”
“Yes, lord.”
“And what do you think? When the strings of your lute were too
taut, was your lute in tune & playable?”
“No, lord.”
“And what do you think? When the strings of your lute were too
loose, was your lute in tune & playable?”
“No, lord.”
“And what do you think? When the strings of your lute were
neither too taut nor too loose, but tuned [lit: established] to
be right on pitch, was your lute in tune & playable?”
“Yes, lord.”
“In the same way, Soṇa, over-aroused persistence leads to
restlessness, overly slack persistence leads to laziness. Thus
you should determine the right pitch for your persistence, attune
the pitch of the (five) faculties (to that), and there pick up
your theme.”
“Yes, lord,” Ven. Soṇa answered the Blessed One. Then, having
given this exhortation to Ven. Soṇa, the Blessed One—as a strong
man might extend his flexed arm or flex his extended
arm—disappeared from the Cool Forest and appeared on Vulture Peak
Mountain.
So after that, Ven. Soṇa determined the right pitch for his
persistence, attuned the pitch of the (five) faculties (to that),
and there picked up his theme. Dwelling alone, secluded, heedful,
ardent, & resolute, he in no long time reached & remained in the
supreme goal of the holy life for which clansmen rightly go forth
from home into homelessness, directly knowing & realizing it for
himself in the here-&-now. He knew: “Birth is ended, the holy
life fulfilled, the task done. There is nothing further for the
sake of this world.” And thus Ven. Soṇa became another one of the
arahants.
“Monks, this is a lowly means of
livelihood, alms gathering. It’s a form of abuse in the world [to
say], ‘You go around as an alms gatherer with a bowl in your
hand!’ Yet reasonable young men of good families have taken it up
for a compelling reason. They have not been forced into it by
kings or robbers, nor through debt, through fear, nor through the
loss of their livelihood, but through the thought: ‘We are beset
by birth, aging, & death, by sorrows, lamentations, pains,
distresses, & despairs, beset by stress, overcome with stress. O,
that the end of this entire mass of suffering & stress might be
known!’ But this young man of good family, having gone forth in
this way, might be greedy for sensual pleasures, strong in his
passions, malevolent in mind, corrupt in his resolves, his
mindfulness muddled, unalert, uncentered, his mind scattered, &
his faculties uncontrolled. Just as a firebrand from a funeral
pyre—burning at both ends, covered with excrement in the
middle—is used as fuel neither in a village nor in the
wilderness: I tell you that this is a simile for this person. He
has missed out on the householder’s enjoyments and does not
fulfill the purpose of the contemplative life.”
He’s missed out
on the householder’s enjoyment
& the purpose of the contemplative life
—unfortunate man!
Ruining it, he throws it away,
perishes
like a firebrand used at a funeral.
Better to eat an iron ball
—glowing, aflame—
than that, unprincipled &
unrestrained,
he should eat the alms of the country.
I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was staying
near Vārāṇasī in the Isipatana game reserve. Then, early in the
morning, the Blessed One—having adjusted his under robe and
carrying his bowl & outer robe—went into Vārāṇasī for alms. As he
was walking for alms near the fig-tree at the cattle yoke, he saw
a certain monk whose delight was in what is empty, whose delight
was in exterior things, his mindfulness muddled, his alertness
lacking, his concentration lacking, his mind gone astray, his
faculties uncontrolled. On seeing him, the Blessed One said to
him: “Monk, monk, don’t let yourself putrefy! On one who lets
himself putrefy & stink with the stench of carrion, there’s no
way that flies won’t swarm & attack!”
Then the monk—admonished with this, the Blessed One’s
admonishment—came to his senses.
So the Blessed One, having gone for alms in Vārāṇasī, after
the meal, returning from his almsround, addressed the monks [and
told them what had happened].
When this was said, a certain monk said to the Blessed One,
“What, lord, is putrefaction? What is the stench of carrion? What
are flies?”
“Greed, monk, is putrefaction. Ill will is the stench of
carrion. Evil, unskillful thoughts are flies. On one who lets
himself putrefy & stink with the stench of carrion, there’s no
way that flies won’t swarm & attack.
“On one whose eyes & ears
are unguarded,
whose senses
are unrestrained,
flies swarm:
resolves dependent
on passion.
The monk who is putrid,
who stinks of the stench of carrion,
is far from unbinding.
His share
is vexation.
Whether he stays
in village or wilderness,
having gained for himself no
tranquility,
he’s surrounded by flies.
But those who are consummate
in virtue,
who delight
in discernment & calm,
pacified, they sleep in ease.
No flies settle on them.”
There were cases in which monks misrepresented the Buddha’s
teachings, and two in which they did so even to his face.
Because knowledge of his teachings depended on word of mouth,
the Buddha had to be especially hard on these monks in front of
the Saṅgha, so as to make clear in no uncertain terms that the
offending monks were, in fact, slandering him.
Now at that time this evil viewpoint
[diṭṭhigata] had arisen in the monk
Ariṭṭha Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers: “As I understand the
Dhamma taught by the Blessed One, those acts the Blessed One says
are obstructive,97
when indulged in, are not genuine obstructions.” A
large number of monks heard, “They say that this evil viewpoint
has arisen in the monk Ariṭṭha Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers:
‘As I understand the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One, those acts
the Blessed One says are obstructive, when indulged in, are not
genuine obstructions.’” So they went to the monk Ariṭṭha
Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers and, on arrival, said to him, “Is
it true, friend Ariṭṭha, that this evil viewpoint has arisen in
you—‘As I understand the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One, those
acts the Blessed One says are obstructive, when indulged in, are
not genuine obstructions’?”
“Yes, indeed, friends. I understand the Dhamma taught by the
Blessed One, and those acts the Blessed One says are obstructive,
when indulged in are not genuine obstructions.”
Then those monks, desiring to pry the monk Ariṭṭha
Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers away from that evil viewpoint,
quizzed him back & forth and rebuked him, saying, “Don’t say
that, friend Ariṭṭha. Don’t slander the Blessed One, for it is
not good to slander the Blessed One. The Blessed One would not
say anything like that. In many ways, friend, the Blessed One has
described obstructive acts, and when indulged in they are genuine
obstructions. The Blessed One has said that sensual pleasures are
of little satisfaction, much stress, much despair, & greater
drawbacks. The Blessed One has compared sensual pleasures to a
chain of bones: of much stress, much despair, & greater
drawbacks. The Blessed One has compared sensual pleasures to a
lump of flesh… a grass torch… a pit of glowing embers… a dream…
borrowed goods… the fruits of a tree… a butcher’s ax and chopping
block… swords and spears… a snake’s head: of much stress, much
despair, & greater drawbacks.”98
And yet even though he was
quizzed back & forth and rebuked by those monks, the monk Ariṭṭha
Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers, through stubbornness and
attachment to that very same evil viewpoint, continued to insist,
“Yes, indeed, friends. I understand the Dhamma taught by the
Blessed One, and those acts the Blessed One says are obstructive,
when indulged in are not genuine obstructions.”
So when the monks were unable to pry the monk Ariṭṭha
Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers away from that evil viewpoint,
they went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed down
to him, sat to one side. As they were sitting there, they [told
him what had happened].
So the Blessed One told a certain monk, “Come, monk. In my
name, call the monk Ariṭṭha Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers,
saying, ‘The Teacher calls you, friend Ariṭṭha.’”
“As you say, lord,” the monk responded and went to the monk
Ariṭṭha Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers. On arrival, he said,
“The Teacher calls you, friend Ariṭṭha.”
“As you say, my friend,” the monk Ariṭṭha
Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers responded. Then he went to the
Blessed One and, on arrival, having bowed down to him, sat to one
side. As he was sitting there, the Blessed One said to him, “Is
it true, Ariṭṭha, that this evil viewpoint has arisen in you—‘As
I understand the Dhamma taught by the Blessed One, those acts the
Blessed One says are obstructive, when indulged in, are not
genuine obstructions’?”
“Yes, indeed, lord. I understand the Dhamma taught by the
Blessed One, and those acts the Blessed One says are obstructive,
when indulged in are not genuine obstructions.”
“Worthless man, from whom have you understood that Dhamma
taught by me in such a way? Worthless man, haven’t I in many ways
described obstructive acts? And when indulged in they are genuine
obstructions. I have said that sensual pleasures are of little
satisfaction, much stress, much despair, & greater drawbacks. I
have compared sensual pleasures to a chain of bones… a snake’s
head: of much stress, much despair, & greater drawbacks. But you,
worthless man, through your own wrong grasp (of the Dhamma), have
slandered us as well as injuring yourself and accumulating much
demerit for yourself, for that will lead to your long-term harm &
suffering.”99
Then the Blessed One said to the monks, “What do you think,
monks? Is this monk Ariṭṭha Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers even
warm100
in this Dhamma & Vinaya?”
“How could he be, lord? No, lord.”
When this was said, the monk Ariṭṭha
Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers sat silent, abashed, his
shoulders drooping, his head down, brooding, at a loss for
words.
Then the Blessed One, seeing that the monk Ariṭṭha
Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers was sitting silent, abashed, his
shoulders drooping, his head down, brooding, at a loss for words,
said to him, “Worthless man, you will be recognized for your own
evil viewpoint. I will cross-examine the monks on this
matter.”
Then the Blessed One addressed the monks, “Monks, do you, too,
understand the Dhamma as taught by me in the same way that the
monk Ariṭṭha Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers does when, through
his own wrong grasp, he both slanders us as well as injuring himself
and accumulating much demerit for himself?”
“No, lord, for in many ways the Blessed One has described
obstructive acts to us, and when indulged in they are genuine
obstructions. The Blessed One has said that sensual pleasures are
of little satisfaction, much stress, much despair, & greater
drawbacks. The Blessed One has compared sensual pleasures to a
chain of bones… a snake’s head: of much stress, much despair, &
greater drawbacks.”
“It’s good, monks, that you understand the Dhamma taught by me
in this way.… But this monk Ariṭṭha
Formerly-of-the-Vulture-Killers, through his own wrong grasp (of
the Dhamma), has both slandered us as well as injuring himself
and accumulating much demerit for himself, and that will lead to
this worthless man’s long-term harm & suffering. For a person to
indulge in sensual pleasures without sensual passion, without
sensual perception, without sensual thinking: That isn’t
possible.”101
Given the Buddha’s background as a member of the noble
warrior caste, it’s not surprising that he would use martial
analogies to exhort his monks in the practice.
“Monks, there are these five types of warriors who can be
found existing in the world. Which five?
“There is the case of a warrior who, on seeing a cloud of dust
[stirred up by the enemy army], falters, faints, doesn’t steel
himself, can’t engage in the battle.…
“Then there is the warrior who can handle the cloud of dust,
but on seeing the top of the enemy’s banner, he falters, faints,
doesn’t steel himself, can’t engage in the battle.…
“Then there is the warrior who can handle the cloud of dust &
the top of the enemy’s banner, but on hearing the tumult [of the
approaching forces], he falters, faints, doesn’t steel himself,
can’t engage in the battle.…
“Then there is the warrior who can handle the cloud of dust,
the top of the enemy’s banner, & the tumult, but when in
hand-to-hand combat he is struck and falls wounded.…
“Then there is the warrior who can handle the cloud of dust,
the top of the enemy’s banner, the tumult, & the hand-to-hand
combat. On winning the battle, victorious in battle, he comes out
at the very head of the battle.…
“These are the five types of warriors who can be found
existing in the world.
“In the same way, monks, there are these five warrior-like
individuals who can be found existing among the monks. Which
five?
“There is the case of the monk who, on seeing a cloud of dust,
falters, faints, doesn’t steel himself, can’t continue in the
holy life. Declaring his weakness in the training, he leaves the
training and returns to the lower life. What is the cloud of dust
for him? There is the case of the monk who hears, ‘In that
village or town over there is a woman or girl who is shapely,
good-looking, charming, endowed with the foremost lotus-like
complexion.’ On hearing this, he falters, faints, doesn’t steel
himself, can’t continue in the holy life. Declaring his weakness
in the training, he leaves the training and returns to the lower
life. That, for him, is the cloud of dust.…
“Then there is the case of the monk who can handle the cloud
of dust, but on seeing the top of the enemy’s banner, he falters,
faints, doesn’t steel himself, can’t continue in the holy life.
Declaring his weakness in the training, he leaves the training
and returns to the lower life. What is the top of the banner for
him? There is the case of the monk who not only hears that ‘In
that village or town over there is a woman or girl who is
shapely, good-looking, charming, endowed with the foremost
lotus-like complexion.’ He sees for himself that in that village
or town over there is a woman or girl who is shapely,
good-looking, charming, endowed with the foremost lotus-like
complexion. On seeing her, he falters, faints, doesn’t steel
himself, can’t continue in the holy life. Declaring his weakness
in the training, he leaves the training and returns to the lower
life. That, for him, is the top of the banner.…
“Then there is the case of the monk who can handle the cloud
of dust & the top of the enemy’s banner, but on hearing the
tumult [of the approaching forces], he falters, faints, doesn’t
steel himself, can’t continue in the holy life. Declaring his
weakness in the training, he leaves the training and returns to
the lower life. What is the tumult for him? There is the case of
the monk who has gone to the wilderness, to the foot of a tree,
or to an empty building. A woman approaches him and giggles at
him, calls out to him, laughs aloud, & teases him. On being
giggled at, called out to, laughed at, & teased by the woman, he
falters, faints, doesn’t steel himself, can’t continue in the
holy life. Declaring his weakness in the training, he leaves the
training and returns to the lower life. That, for him, is the
tumult.…
“Then there is the case of the monk who can handle the cloud
of dust, the top of the enemy’s banner, & the tumult, but when in
hand-to-hand combat he is struck and falls wounded. What is the
hand-to-hand combat for him? There is the case of the monk who
has gone to the wilderness, to the foot of a tree, or to an empty
building. A woman approaches him and sits down right next to him,
lies down right next to him, throws herself all over him. When
she sits down right next to him, lies down right next to him, and
throws herself all over him, he—without renouncing the training,
without declaring his weakness—engages in sexual intercourse.
This, for him, is hand-to-hand combat.…
“Then there is the case of the monk who can handle the cloud
of dust, the top of the enemy’s banner, the tumult, &
hand-to-hand combat. On winning the battle, victorious in battle,
he comes out at the very head of the battle. What is victory in
the battle for him? There is the case of the monk who has gone to
the wilderness, to the foot of a tree, or to an empty dwelling. A
woman approaches him and sits down right next to him, lies down
right next to him, throws herself all over him. When she sits
down right next to him, lies down right next to him, and throws
herself all over him, he extricates himself, frees himself, and
goes off where he will.”
“Endowed with four qualities, monks, a
warrior is worthy of a king, an asset to a king, and counts as a
very limb of his king. Which four?
“There is the case where a warrior is skilled in his stance,
able to shoot far, able to fire shots in rapid succession, and
able to pierce great objects. A warrior endowed with these four
dhammas is worthy of a king, an asset to a king, and counts as a
very limb of his king.
“In the same way, a monk endowed with four qualities is
deserving of gifts, deserving of hospitality, deserving of
offerings, deserving of respect, an unexcelled field of merit for
the world. Which four?
“There is the case where a monk is skilled in his stance, able
to shoot far, able to fire shots in rapid succession, and able to
pierce great objects. A monk endowed with these four dhammas is
deserving of gifts, deserving of hospitality, deserving of
offerings, deserving of respect, an unexcelled field of merit for
the world.
“And how is a monk skilled in his stance? There is the case
where a monk is virtuous. He dwells restrained in accordance with
the Pāṭimokkha, consummate in his behavior & sphere of activity.
He trains himself, having undertaken the training rules, seeing
danger in the slightest faults. This is how a monk is skilled in
his stance.
“And how is a monk one who is able to shoot far? There is the
case where a monk sees any form whatsoever that is past, future,
or present; internal or external; blatant or subtle; common or
sublime; far or near—every form—as it has come to be, with right
discernment as: ‘This is not mine. This is not my self. This is
not what I am.’
[Similarly with feeling, perception, fabrications, &
consciousness.]
“This is how a monk is one who is able to shoot far.
“And how is a monk one who is able to fire shots in rapid
succession? There is the case where a monk discerns, as it has
come to be, that ‘This is stress’ … ‘This is the origination
of stress’ … ‘This is the cessation of stress’ … ‘This is the
path of practice leading to the cessation of stress.’ This
is how a monk is one who is able to fire shots in rapid
succession.
“And how is a monk one who is able to pierce great objects?
There is the case where a monk pierces right through the great
mass of ignorance. This is how a monk is one who is able to
pierce great objects right through.
“Endowed with these four qualities, a monk is deserving of
gifts, deserving of hospitality, deserving of offerings,
deserving of respect, an unexcelled field of merit for the
world.”
“Suppose that an archer or archer’s
apprentice were to practice on a straw man or mound of clay, so
that after a while he would become able to shoot long distances,
to fire accurate shots in rapid succession, and to pierce great
masses. In the same way, there is the case where a monk… enters
and remains in the first jhāna: rapture & pleasure born of
seclusion, accompanied by directed thought & evaluation. He
regards whatever phenomena there that are connected with form,
feeling, perception, fabrications, & consciousness, as
inconstant, stressful, a disease, a cancer, an arrow, painful, an
affliction, alien, a disintegration, an emptiness, not-self. He
turns his mind away from those phenomena, and having done so,
inclines his mind to the property of deathlessness: ‘This is
peace, this is exquisite—the pacification of all fabrications;
the relinquishing of all acquisitions; the ending of craving;
dispassion; cessation; unbinding.’
“Staying right there, he reaches the ending of effluents. Or,
if not, then—through this very Dhamma-passion, this
Dhamma-delight, and from the total wasting away of the five lower
fetters [self-identity views, uncertainty, grasping at habits &
practices, sensual passion, and irritation]—he is due to arise
spontaneously [in the Pure Abodes], there to be totally unbound,
never again to return from that world. [Similarly with the
remaining jhānas and the formless attainments up through the
dimension of nothingness.]”
The Theragāthā tells us that the Buddha’s cousin, Ānanda,
took on the constant position of the Buddha’s personal
attendant during the last twenty-five years of the Buddha’s
life. However, in the early years a number of other monks also
served in that position on a temporary basis as part of their
training—with varying degrees of success.
I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One was
journeying along a road in the Kosalan country with Ven.
Nāgasamāla as his junior companion. Ven. Nāgasamāla, while going
along the road, saw a fork in the path. On seeing it, he said to
the Blessed One, “That, lord Blessed One,103 is the route.
We go that way.” When this was said, the Blessed One said, “This,
Nāgasamāla, is the route. We go this way.”
A second time… A third time, Ven. Nāgasamāla said to the
Blessed One, “That, Lord Blessed One, is the route. We go that
way.” And for a third time, the Blessed One said, “This,
Nāgasamāla, is the route. We go this way.”
Then Ven. Nāgasamāla, placing the Blessed One’s bowl & robes
right there on the ground, left, saying, “This, Lord Blessed One,
is the bowl & robes.”
Then as Ven. Nāgasamāla was going along that route,
thieves—jumping out in the middle of the road—pummeled him with
their fists & feet, broke his bowl, and ripped his outer robe to
shreds.
So Ven. Nāgasamāla—with his bowl broken, his outer robe ripped
to shreds—went to the Blessed One and, on arrival, bowed down to
him and sat to one side. As he was sitting there he said to the
Blessed One, “Just now, lord, as I was going along that route,
thieves jumped out in the middle of the road, pummeled me with
their fists & feet, broke my bowl, and ripped my outer robe to
shreds.”
Then, on realizing the significance of that, the Blessed One
on that occasion exclaimed:
I have heard that on one occasion the Blessed One, on a
wandering tour among the Kosalans with a large Saṅgha of monks,
arrived at a Kosalan brahman village named Icchānaṅgala. There he
stayed in the Icchānaṅgala forest grove.
The brahman householders of Icchānaṅgala heard it said,
“Gotama the contemplative… has arrived at Icchānaṅgala and is
staying in the Icchānaṅgala forest grove. And of that Master
Gotama this fine reputation has spread: ‘He is indeed a Blessed
One, worthy & rightly self-awakened…. It is good to see such a
worthy one.’”
So the brahman householders of Icchānaṅgala, when the night
was gone, taking many staple & non-staple foods, went to the gate
house of the Icchānaṅgala forest grove. On arrival, they stood
there making a loud racket, a great racket.
Now at that time Ven. Nāgita was the Blessed One’s attendant.
So the Blessed One addressed Ven. Nāgita: “Nāgita, what is that
loud racket, that great racket, like fishermen with a catch of
fish?”
“Lord, those are the brahman householders of Icchānaṅgala
standing at the gate house to the Icchānaṅgala forest grove,
having brought many staple & non-staple foods for the sake of the
Blessed One & the Saṅgha of monks.”
“May I have nothing to do with honor, Nāgita, and honor
nothing to do with me. Whoever cannot obtain at will—without
difficulty, without trouble—as I do, the pleasure of
renunciation, the pleasure of seclusion, the pleasure of peace,
the pleasure of self-awakening, let him consent to this
slimy-excrement pleasure, this drowsiness pleasure, this pleasure
of gains, offerings, & fame.”
“Lord, let the Blessed One acquiesce (to their offerings) now!
Let the One Well-Gone acquiesce now! Now is the time for the
Blessed One’s acquiescence, lord! Now is the time for the Blessed
One’s acquiescence, lord! Wherever the Blessed One will go now,
the brahmans of the towns & countryside will be so inclined. Just
as when the rain-devas send rain in fat drops, the waters flow
with the incline, in the same way, wherever the Blessed One will
go now, the brahmans of the towns & countryside will be so
inclined. Why is that? Because such is the Blessed One’s virtue &
discernment.”
“May I have nothing to do with honor, Nāgita, and honor
nothing to do with me. Whoever cannot obtain at will—without
difficulty, without trouble—as I do, the pleasure of
renunciation, the pleasure of seclusion, the pleasure of peace,
the pleasure of self-awakening, let him consent to this
slimy-excrement pleasure, this drowsiness pleasure, this pleasure
of gains, offerings, & fame.
“Even some devas, Nāgita, cannot obtain at will—without
difficulty, without trouble—as I do, the pleasure of
renunciation, the pleasure of seclusion, the pleasure of peace,
the pleasure of self-awakening. When you all live together,
assemble together, and live committed to dwelling with a group,
the thought occurs to me: ‘Surely these venerable ones cannot
obtain at will—without difficulty, without trouble—as I do, the
pleasure of renunciation, the pleasure of seclusion, the pleasure
of peace, the pleasure of self-awakening, which is why they live
together, assemble together, and live committed to dwelling with
a group.’
[1] “There is the case, Nāgita, where I see monks laughing out
loud, sporting around, tickling one another with their fingers.
The thought occurs to me, ‘Surely these venerable ones cannot
obtain at will—without difficulty, without trouble—as I do, the
pleasure of renunciation, the pleasure of seclusion, the pleasure
of peace, the pleasure of self-awakening, which is why they are
laughing out loud, sporting around, tickling one another with
their fingers.’
[2] “Then there is the case where I see monks—having eaten as
much as they want, filling their bellies—live committed to the
pleasure of lying down, the pleasure of sensory contacts, the
pleasure of drowsiness. The thought occurs to me, ‘Surely these
venerable ones cannot obtain at will—without difficulty, without
trouble—as I do, the pleasure of renunciation, the pleasure of
seclusion, the pleasure of peace, the pleasure of self-awakening,
which is why they—having eaten as much as they want, filling
their bellies—live committed to the pleasure of lying down, the
pleasure of sensory contacts, the pleasure of drowsiness.
[3] “Then there is the case where I see a monk sitting in
concentration in a village (monastery) dwelling. The thought
occurs to me, ‘Soon a monastery attendant will disturb this
venerable one in some way, or a novice will, and rouse him from
his concentration.’ And so I am not pleased with that monk’s
village-dwelling.
[4] “But then there is the case where I see a monk sitting,
nodding, in the wilderness. The thought occurs to me, ‘Soon this
venerable one will dispel his drowsiness & fatigue and attend to
the wilderness-perception, (his mind) unified.’ And so I am
pleased with that monk’s wilderness-dwelling.
[5] “Then there is the case where I see a wilderness monk
sitting unconcentrated in the wilderness. The thought occurs to
me, ‘Soon this venerable one will center his unconcentrated mind
or protect his concentrated mind.’ And so I am pleased with that
monk’s wilderness-dwelling.
[6] “Then there is the case where I see a wilderness monk
sitting in concentration in the wilderness. The thought occurs to
me, ‘Soon this venerable one will release his unreleased mind or
protect his released mind.’ And so I am pleased with that monk’s
wilderness-dwelling.
[7] “Then there is the case where I see a village-dwelling
monk who receives robes, almsfood, shelter, & medicinal
requisites for curing the sick. Receiving, as he likes, those
gains, offerings, & fame, he neglects seclusion, he neglects
isolated forest & wilderness dwellings. He makes his living by
visiting villages, towns, & cities. And so I am not pleased with
that monk’s village-dwelling.
[8] “Then there is the case where I see a wilderness monk who
receives robes, almsfood, shelter, & medicinal requisites for
curing the sick. Fending off those gains, offerings, & fame, he
doesn’t neglect seclusion, doesn’t neglect isolated forest &
wilderness dwellings. And so I am pleased with that monk’s
wilderness-dwelling.
“But when I am traveling along a road and see no one in front
or behind me, at that time I have my ease, even when urinating &
defecating.”
Chapter Seven
Training the Saṅgha
As we have seen, the Buddha began legislating rules for the Saṅgha early in his teaching career, beginning with his allowances for Acceptance and for monasteries. However, it wasn’t until later that he began legislating a Pāṭimokkha, a code of rules, that eventually became the backbone of the Vinaya. The events leading up to the legislation of the first rule in the Pāṭimokkha are these:
The ideals that the Buddha cited in his rebuke of Ven. Sudinna—such as contentment, modesty, austerity, and energy—were repeated each time he legislated a rule for the Pāṭimokkha. They are important to keep in mind, for as we will see, the Buddha often legislated these rules in response to complaints from the laity or from the monks or nuns. This has given rise to the impression that his rules were determined by public opinion. This impression is mistaken because, as we will also see, there were instances where his rules went against the majority view of public opinion, and—in a few cases—even met with resistance from the monks and nuns. If we search for a constant theme in the legislation of the rules, we have to look to this list of ideals—some of which, the Buddha noted, derive from the traditions of the noble ones dating far back to ancient times.
Here are a few examples of how the Buddha legislated rules sometimes in response to complaints, sometimes on his own initiative.
When the Buddha legislated the Pāṭimokkha rule against eating after noon, not all the monks were happy with it.
Although, as we have seen, the Buddha would sometimes lay down rules in response to criticism from the laity, there were also times when he would lay down rules forbidding behavior that many lay people liked and admired. Here are two examples of this principle. The first example illustrates an additional point as well: Even though the Buddha would sometimes display his psychic powers as a way of inspiring his listeners, he couldn’t always trust disciples with psychic powers to share his discretion as to when such powers should and shouldn’t be displayed. So he had to forbid them from displaying their powers to the laity in all situations.
After the banishment transaction was imposed on the followers of Assaji and Punabbasu—requiring them to leave their residence—they did not comply. Instead, they cursed and reviled the monks who had imposed the transaction. So the Buddha had the monks impose a further saṅghādisesa offense on them to give them one more chance to mend their ways. The Canon does not record whether the affair was ever resolved.
The Buddha continued legislating rules, major and minor, for many years. Some of them were included in the Pāṭimokkha, many were not. Those not included there were gathered in other sections of the Vinaya, called the Khandhakas. As the rules grew in number, some of the monks found them overwhelming. In response to the honest complaint of one such monk, the Buddha affirmed that all the rules had a consistent set of principles underlying them.
Two of the rules regarding robe cloth, not included in the Pāṭimokkha, were legislated in a way that reveals a great deal about the Buddha as a person. The first incident below is another example of a rule laid down, not in response to any event, but from the Buddha’s own inspiration.
In addition to legislating rules for the Saṅgha, the Buddha continued training the monks in the Dhamma, sometimes using gentleness, sometimes strictness, and sometimes humor, as the case required.
There were cases in which monks misrepresented the Buddha’s teachings, and two in which they did so even to his face. Because knowledge of his teachings depended on word of mouth, the Buddha had to be especially hard on these monks in front of the Saṅgha, so as to make clear in no uncertain terms that the offending monks were, in fact, slandering him.
Given the Buddha’s background as a member of the noble warrior caste, it’s not surprising that he would use martial analogies to exhort his monks in the practice.
The Theragāthā tells us that the Buddha’s cousin, Ānanda, took on the constant position of the Buddha’s personal attendant during the last twenty-five years of the Buddha’s life. However, in the early years a number of other monks also served in that position on a temporary basis as part of their training—with varying degrees of success.